PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2026Early Intervention in Psychiatry0 citations

To Fidelity and Beyond: Development of an Implementation Fidelity Tool for Early Intervention for Eating Disorders Services

View Full Paper
LHLucy HyamLGL. M. GallagherGCGiulia Di Clemente

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop and pilot test an implementation fidelity tool for early intervention services, specifically FREED.
  • Iterative consultation with the FREED national team to define key aims and components.
  • Drafted a scoring rubric and assessed it through two evaluations in a London FREED service.
  • Collected routine data and conducted interviews with team members for assessment.
  • The fidelity tool contained 35 items across two components: rapid access and adherence to the care package.
  • Overall fidelity scores were 63% at the first assessment and 60% at the second, indicating lower fidelity.
  • Component scores varied, with rapid access rated as 'not satisfactory' and care package support at 'medium fidelity'.
  • Inter-rater reliability showed almost perfect agreement in scoring across assessments.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction First Episode Rapid Early Intervention for Eating Disorders (FREED) is an early intervention service model for young people with recent‐onset eating disorders. This manuscript describes the development and pilot testing of an implementation fidelity tool for FREED or similar early intervention models, exploring feasibility of the tool and changes in fidelity over time. Methods An iterative consultation process within the FREED national team reviewed the core aims, functions, principles, and key components of FREED services. A set of items and a scoring rubric were drafted and pilot‐tested via two assessments in a London‐based FREED service with routine data and interviews with team members. Items were scored independently by two raters. Inter‐rater reliability was assessed. Results The fidelity tool comprised 35 items across two components: (1) rapid access to the service and (2) adherence to the FREED care package (e.g., family involvement, attention to transitions). Overall fidelity scores were 63% at time 1% and 60% at time 2, indicating ‘lower’ fidelity. Component scores ranged from ‘not satisfactory’ for rapid access, to ‘medium fidelity’ for care package components. Weighted Cohen's kappa indicated almost perfect agreement across assessments. Conclusion This is the first fidelity measurement tool for early intervention eating disorders services. It demonstrated feasibility, simple administration, and time efficiency. Pilot testing suggested fidelity to some aspects of FREED, but further support is required to improve fidelity. Future work should focus on refining the tool (e.g., further psychometric evaluation) and testing it in more services to investigate whether ongoing assessments support fidelity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hyam et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69730f9fc8125b09b0d1f586https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.70132
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper