PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 20260 citationsOpen Access

A Review of Generalization in Additive Manufacturing Optimization

View Full Paper
MKMuhammad Waleed KhalidTATaimoor Hassan Abbasi

Key Points

  • The aim is to understand and address the generalization issues in additive manufacturing process optimization across different contexts.
  • Reviewed various additive manufacturing techniques, including FFF, SLA, SLS, and more.
  • Identified root causes of non-generalizability in process parameters.
  • Evaluated optimization methods like design-of-experiments, machine learning, and Bayesian optimization.
  • Proposed emerging techniques such as meta-learning and digital twins for improved optimization.
  • Most existing optimization models are localized and do not perform well across different machines or materials.
  • Identified causes of non-generalizability include machine variation and insufficient datasets.
  • Highlighted the need for standardized benchmarks and improvements in data fusion techniques.

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) has transitioned from prototyping to functionalpart production across aerospace, biomedical, automotive, energy,tooling, and consumer sectors. However, achieving consistent part qualityremains challenging due to the strong sensitivity of AM processes to a multitudeof interdependent parameters. Over the past decade, thousands ofstudies have optimized process parameters for specific materials, machines,and geometries. Yet, these optimized solutions overwhelmingly lack generalizability:parameters that yield good results on one machine, geometry, AMtechnology, or material often fail when transferred to another context.This review provides the first unified, cross-technology examination ofthe generalizability problem in AM process-parameter optimization. Wesynthesize evidence from polymer, metal, and ceramic AM processes— includingFused Filament Fabrication (FFF), Stereolithography (SLA), SelectiveLaser Sintering (SLS), Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF/SLM), ElectronBeam Melting (EBM), Directed Energy Deposition (DED), and binderjetting. The review identifies root causes of non-generalizability, includingmachine-to-machine variation, material thermal and rheological inconsistency,geometry-scaling effects, environmental sensitivity, multiscale multiphysicsinteractions, and the lack of standardized benchmark datasets.We critically evaluate optimization approaches ranging from design-ofexperiments(DOE) and regression models to machine learning (ML), deeplearning, Bayesian optimization, simulation-driven optimization, and multifidelitymodelling. The evidence reveals that most models fit locally but failto transfer across new materials, geometries, and machines due to limiteddatasets, local search spaces, and insufficient physics incorporation. Emergingdirections such as meta-learning, transfer learning, physics informed machinelearning, multi-fidelity data fusion, closed-loop control, and digitaltwins are proposed as pathways toward generalized, scalable optimization.The review concludes by outlining research gaps that must be overcome forAM to achieve fully autonomous, machine-independent, quality-assured manufacturing.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Khalid et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69730f9fc8125b09b0d1f600https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18330448
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper