PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2026Journal of Clinical Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Retrospective Analysis of IOL Power Calculation by Ray Tracing in Eyes with Previous Radial Keratotomy

View Full Paper
GSGiacomo SaviniKHKenneth J. HofferAGArianna Grendele

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess how accurately ray tracing can calculate intraocular lens (IOL) power in eyes that have undergone radial keratotomy (RK).
  • Retrospective analysis of consecutive eyes with previous RK
  • Optical biometry measured axial length and anterior segment imaging
  • Used ray tracing software for IOL power calculation
  • Compared results with other formulas like Barrett True-K and Haigis
  • Mean prediction error was −0.03 ± 0.65 D
  • Mean absolute error was 0.52 D
  • 29.17% of eyes had prediction error within ±0.25 D
  • 62.50% within ±0.50 D, and 87.50% within ±1.00 D
  • Ray tracing is accurate compared to traditional formulas with no significant differences observed.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: To evaluate the predictive accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation by ray tracing in eyes with previous radial keratotomy (RK). Methods: A consecutive series of eyes with previous RK was retrospectively analyzed. Preoperatively, all eyes underwent optical biometry to measure the axial length (AL) and anterior segment imaging by the MS-39 (CSO), which combines Placido disk corneal topography and anterior segment optical coherence tomography. The built-in ray tracing software was used to calculate the IOL power. For comparative purposes, the results of the Barrett True-K, EVO, Haigis total keratometry, and PEARL-DGS formulas were also investigated. The refractive outcomes were evaluated with Eyetemis. Results: Twenty-four eyes (24 patients) were investigated. The mean AL and keratometry were, respectively, 27.34 ± 2.88 mm and 35.53 ± 3.66 diopters (D). The mean prediction error (PE) was −0.03 ± 0.65 D (range: from −1.30 to +1.64 D). The mean and median absolute errors were 0.52 and 0.48 D, respectively. The percentages of eyes with a PE within ±0.25 D, ±0.50 D, and ±1.00 D were 29.17%, 62.50%, and 87.50%, respectively. A comparison with the other formulas was possible in 20 eyes and did not reveal any statistically significant differences; the percentage of eyes with a PE within ±0.50 D ranged from 50 to 65%. Conclusions: Ray tracing is a relatively accurate solution for calculating the IOL power in eyes with previous RK. Paraxial formulas provide similar outcomes and should be considered in these patients. The refractive outcomes of IOL power calculation in post-RK eyes are still below modern benchmarks for virgin eyes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Savini et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69731047c8125b09b0d1ff59https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020866
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper