PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2026Journal of risk and financial management0 citationsOpen Access

Bond vs. Equity Mutual Fund Performance Using False Discovery Rate (FDR)

View Full Paper
LHLifa HuangWLWayne Y LeeCRCraig G. Rennie

Key Points

  • The aim is to compare the performance of bond and equity mutual funds using the False Discovery Rate methodology.
  • Compared actively managed bond and equity mutual funds
  • Employed modified False Discovery Rate (q∗) for analysis
  • Assessed net excess returns using simulated t-tests
  • 33.9% of bond funds generated positive net excess returns, compared to 1.8% for equity funds
  • Found bond fund outperformance related to long-term holdings
  • Corporate bond fund excess returns tend to decrease with fund size

Abstract

This paper compares actively managed bond vs. equity mutual fund performance using modified False Discovery Rate (q∗) and percent simulated t(α) < Actual t(α). Bond funds are more likely to outperform than equity funds: q∗(%Sim < Act) shows 33.9% (30.0%) of bond funds generate positive t(α) on net excess returns vs. 1.8% (0.0%) for equity funds. q∗ shows percent simulated t(α) < Actual t(α)results are sensitive to Type II error. Bond fund outperformance is associated with long-term holdings, and corporate bond fund excess returns tend to decline with fund size.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69731047c8125b09b0d200cfhttps://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm19010089
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper