PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2026Medical Journal of Dr D Y Patil Vidyapeeth0 citationsOpen Access

Prognostic Impact of Histological Scores of Tumor Microenvironment in Gall Bladder Carcinoma

View Full Paper
MKMandeep Kaur KingraASAnamika SinhaHSHarish Sadashiva

Key Points

  • To assess the prognostic value of histological scores of tumor microenvironment in gall bladder carcinoma.
  • Evaluated tumor stroma percentage, KM grade, and GMS in 50 gall bladder carcinoma cases.
  • Analyzed associations with clinicopathologic variables and survival probabilities.
  • High TSP linked to perineural invasion presence.
  • High KM grade found more in females.
  • Higher GMS associated with higher T stage and perineural invasion.
  • Poor survival linked to high TSP, while better outcomes associated with higher KM grades and low GMS.

Abstract

Background: Tumor microenvironment plays a critical role in the survival and growth of cancer cells. Tumor stroma percentage (TSP), Kintrup-Makinen (KM) grade – which indicates the density of inflammatory cells at the invasive front of the tumor – and Glasgow microenvironment score (GCS) – which combines TSP and KM grade – were assessed for their prognostic value in gall bladder carcinoma (GBC). Materials and Methods: TSP, KM grade, and GMS were used as histological scores to evaluate 50 consecutive cases of GBC in resection specimens. The association of these scores with clinicopathologic variables and survival probabilities was assessed. Results: High TSP was associated with the presence of perineural invasion, and high KM grade was associated with the female gender. Higher GMS was associated with higher T stage and the presence of perineural invasion. High TSP was associated with poor survival probabilities, while a better survival outcome was associated with higher KM grades and low GMS. Conclusion: There is a substantial association between clinicopathologic variables such as perineural invasion, gender, and tumor stage with TSP, KM grade, and GMS. Evaluating these histological scores is practical and cost-effective to identify the biologic characteristics of tumor microenvironment and prognosis in cases of GBC.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kingra et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/697310b0c8125b09b0d20643https://doi.org/10.4103/mjdrdypu.mjdrdypu_1055_24
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluation of Glasgow Microenvironment Score in Colorectal Carcinoma and Its Association with Prognostic Markers2026
  2. 2The Glasgow Microenvironment Score: an exemplar of contemporary biomarker evolution in colorectal cancer2024 · 3 citations
  3. 3Prognostic Significance of Tumour Budding and Tumour-infiltrating Lymphocytes in Gallbladder Carcinoma2025
  4. 4The Tumor Microenvironment Score and Its Subsite-Specific Relevance in Colon Cancer2026
  5. 5Histopathological tumour microenvironment score independently predicts outcome in primary operable colorectal cancer2024 · 1 citations