PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 24, 2026International Journal of Conflict Management0 citations

Adapting and validating the workplace weight-based teasing scale and its relationship with workplace aggression and psychological distress

View Full Paper
SBSuhans BansalDKDinesh KumarNGNaval Garg

Key Points

  • The study aims to develop and validate a scale measuring weight-based teasing in workplace settings among diverse populations in India.
  • Conducted systematic scale development through literature review and focus group discussions.
  • Performed exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to validate the scale's structure.
  • Assessed the scale's reliability and criterion validity in a multi-study approach.
  • Tested gender-based measurement invariance to ensure applicability across demographics.
  • Validated a single-factor, five-item scale for weight-based teasing in the organizational context.
  • Weight-based teasing was identified as a significant predictor of psychological distress among employees.
  • The scale demonstrated incremental validity, providing additional explanatory power over aggression and control variables.
  • Confirmed measurement invariance of the scale within the Indian context.

Abstract

Purpose The Western literature presents scales that measure weight-based teasing; however, their applicability is limited to adolescents and patients. There are limited studies that have explored this teasing in organizational settings, specifically in as culturally diverse and sensitive work environments as those in India. Given the rising cases of weight-based teasing toward both obese and skinny people, a dedicated measurement tool that is applicable in organizational settings is required. Hence, this study aims to develop the Workplace Weight-Based Teasing Scale (W-WBTS), investigate its psychometric properties in the Indian context, and examine its relationship with aggression, psychological distress, and subjective well-being. Design/methodology/approach Data was collected from the employees working at multi-national companies in the Delhi NCR region. This study adopted a systematic scale development methodology involving a literature review and focused group discussions to generate scale items. The study then conducted two independent studies to explore the psychometric properties of the W-WBTS in India. The factorial structure in Study 1 was assessed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) (using SPSS) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) (using AMOS). Study 2 evaluated the reliability and validity of the scale. Finally, gender-based invariances were tested using the measurement invariance test. Findings EFA and CFA validated a single-factor five-item scale in Study 1. The second study’s results established the criterion validity of this scale. Furthermore, the results suggest that weight-based teasing is one of the statistically significant predictors of psychological distress in organizations, thus recommending and affirming its predictive validity. The study confirmed the scale’s incremental validity by explaining variance in psychological distress over aggression and control variables, suggesting its added predictive value over existing scales. Finally, the results confirmed the measurement invariance test of W-WBTS in Indian context. Originality/value Existing scales predominantly focus on adolescents and patients, emphasizing only on obese populations. This study is first of its kind that fills a critical gap by adapting and validating a scale tailored for working professionals, encompassing both skinny and obese people.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bansal et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6974602bbb9d90c67120a0c8https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-06-2025-0186
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper