PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 24, 2026Antibiotics2 citationsOpen Access

Comparison of a Single-Shot Antibiotic Protocol Compared to a Conventional 5-Day Antibiotic Protocol in Equine Diagnostic Laparotomy Regarding Pre- and Postoperative Colonization with Multi-Drug-Resistant Indicator Pathogens

View Full Paper
SSS D StöckleDKDania Annika KannapinRMRoswitha Merle

Key Points

  • This study aims to compare the effects of single-shot and 5-day antibiotic protocols on the colonization of multi-drug-resistant bacteria in horses after laparotomy.
  • Collected nasal swabs and fecal samples from 67 horses at admission and on postoperative days 3 and 10.
  • Screened samples for multi-drug-resistant indicator pathogens, including MRSA and ESBL-producing Enterobacterales.
  • Monitored rates of colonization and infection dynamics post-surgery.
  • Preoperative rates showed 6.2% positive for MRSA and 13% for ESBL-E.
  • At day 3 postoperatively, 62.1% of nasal swabs and 86.4% of fecal samples tested positive for MDR organisms.
  • Day 10 results indicated 53.4% and 62.5% positivity in nasal swabs and fecal samples, respectively.
  • Five horses developed surgical site infections, with two positive for MRSA, highlighting nasal carriage as a potential infection source.

Abstract

Objective: The emergence and spread of multi-drug-resistant (MDR) bacteria pose a growing threat in veterinary medicine, particularly in equine hospitals. This study investigated the colonization and infection dynamics of horses undergoing emergency laparotomy with two distinct antibiotic protocols (single-shot versus 5-day protocol) during hospitalization. Methods: Nasal swabs and fecal samples were collected from 67 horses undergoing emergency laparotomy at clinic admission as well as on postoperative days 3 and 10. These were screened for multi-drug-resistant indicator pathogens. As multi-drug-resistant indicator pathogens, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), and bacteria belonging to the Acinetobacter baumannii complex were defined. Results: Preoperatively, 6.2% of horses tested positive for MRSA and 13% for ESBL-E. An increase in colonization was observed on day 3 postoperatively, with 62.1% of nasal swabs and 86.4% of fecal samples testing positive for MDR organisms. On day 10, 53.4% of nasal swabs and 62.5% of fecal samples tested positive for indicator pathogens. Surgical site infection developed in five horses, two of which tested positive for MRSA in both nasal and wound samples during hospitalization, supporting the potential role of nasal carriage as a source of infection. Furthermore, all horses tested positive for ESBL-E during at least one time-point during hospitalization, and Enterobacterales (MDR in two surgical site infections (SSI)) were involved in all surgical site infections. No significant differences were observed between the two antibiotic treatment groups regarding colonization rates with indicator pathogens during hospitalization. However, the results indicate that hospitalization itself contributes to increased colonization with resistant bacteria. A clear limitation of the study is the restricted number of sampled horses and the lack of environmental contamination data. Non-sampled hospitalized horses with and without antibiotic treatment may have acted as reservoirs for MDR bacteria. Conclusion: The findings emphasize the need for routine environmental monitoring and strict adherence to hygiene protocols in equine clinics to reduce the risk of nosocomial transmission. Ongoing surveillance and infection control strategies are essential to mitigate the spread of MDR pathogens in veterinary settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stöckle et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6974610cbb9d90c67120adbahttps://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics15010106
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper