PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 24, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Performance evaluation of optimized deep convolution architectures for facial emotion recognition

View Full Paper
NMNeha MathurPJParesh JainPDPankaj Dadhecch

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of two deep learning architectures for recognizing facial emotions.
  • Examined AlexNet and DenseNet-201 architectures using the FER-2013 dataset.
  • Employed transfer learning and data augmentation to improve model performance.
  • Conducted comparative analysis across seven emotion categories.
  • Used performance indices including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score.
  • DenseNet-201 achieved a validation accuracy of 84.91%, outperforming AlexNet's 82.94%.
  • DenseNet-201 excelled in detecting subtle emotions like fear and disgust.
  • Class Activation Mapping provided insights into which facial regions influenced classifications.

Abstract

Facial expression recognition (FER) constitutes a key domain in affective computing and applied psychology, as it enables the systematic assessment of emotional states through observable facial cues. The present study examined the psychometric and methodological properties of two deep convolutional neural network architectures—AlexNet and DenseNet-201—in the automatic classification of emotional expressions using the FER-2013 dataset. Both models employed transfer learning and data augmentation procedures to enhance generalization and robustness. Comparative analyses were conducted across seven emotion categories (anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, surprise, and neutrality) using standard performance indices—accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. AlexNet achieved a validation accuracy of 82.94%, whereas DenseNet-201 yielded 84.91%. DenseNet-201 demonstrated superior discriminative capacity, particularly in the recognition of subtle emotional states such as fear and disgust, which are often more challenging to detect both computationally and psychologically. To support interpretability and construct validity, Class Activation Mapping (CAM) was applied to identify the facial regions most influential in the classification process, offering insight into the visual cues underlying automated emotion assessment. Overall, findings highlight the methodological trade-off between model simplicity and psychometric precision: while AlexNet is suitable for efficient, lightweight applications, DenseNet-201 provides a more accurate and psychologically representative model of facial affect recognition. These results contribute to the integration of advanced computational techniques into psychometric models of emotion measurement and assessment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mathur et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6974610cbb9d90c67120ae59https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18333658
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper