PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 24, 2026Environmetrics0 citations

Enhancing the Accuracy of Spatio‐Temporal Models for Wind Speed Prediction by Incorporating Bias‐Corrected Crowdsourced Data

View Full Paper
EOEamonn OrganMUMaeve UptonDADenis Allard

Key Points

  • The goal is to enhance the accuracy of wind speed predictions by incorporating crowdsourced data while correcting for biases.
  • Develop a framework to integrate data from personal weather stations (PWS) with official meteorological data.
  • Perform bias correction on PWS data using reanalysis data.
  • Implement a Bayesian hierarchical spatiotemporal model that accounts for measurement errors.
  • Including bias-corrected PWS data reduces prediction error by 5% on average.
  • Predictions using this method are comparable to those from well-known reanalysis products.
  • The proposed method enables real-time predictions with improved uncertainty quantification.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Accurate high‐resolution spatial and temporal wind speed data is critical for estimating the wind energy potential of a location. For real‐time wind speed prediction, statistical models typically depend on high‐quality (near) real‐time data from official meteorological stations to improve forecasting accuracy. Personal weather stations (PWS) offer an additional source of real‐time data and broader spatial coverage than official stations. However, they are not subject to rigorous quality control and may exhibit bias or measurement errors. This article presents a framework for incorporating PWS data into statistical models for validated official meteorological station data via a two‐stage approach. First, bias correction is performed on PWS wind speed data using reanalysis data. Second, we implement a Bayesian hierarchical spatiotemporal model that accounts for varying measurement error in the PWS data. This enables wind speed prediction across a target area, and is particularly beneficial for improving predictions in regions sparse in official monitoring stations. Our results show that including bias‐corrected PWS data improves prediction accuracy compared with using meteorological station data alone, with a 5% reduction in prediction error on average across all sites. The results are comparable with popular reanalysis products, but unlike these numerical weather models our approach is available in real‐time and offers improved uncertainty quantification.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Organ et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69746126bb9d90c67120b043https://doi.org/10.1002/env.70069
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper