PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 24, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Monolithic scalable compliant mechanisms.

View Full Paper
JHJared HunterBPBethany ParkinsonJSJacob L. Sheffield

Key Points

  • This research investigates how mechanical properties change with the scaling of compliant mechanisms and emphasizes stress invariance.
  • Theoretically analyze scaling effects on mechanical properties
  • Use computer models to verify assumptions
  • Conduct physical testing with three examples of compliant mechanisms
  • Mechanical stress remains invariant despite changes in scale
  • Unique designs are needed for each scale due to varying mechanical behavior
  • Demonstrated through practical examples: a guiding mechanism, a launcher, and a chair

Abstract

Scaling a physical device's geometry results in mechanical properties changing in various ways (e.g. the cubed-squared law states that for a scaling factor C, mass scales with C3 and surface area with C2). These scaling effects can result in a device's inconsistent and unplanned mechanical behavior when varying its fabricated size, thereby necessitating unique designs at different scales. We show that for displacement-driven compliant mechanisms, mechanical stress is uniquely invariant with scale. This effect is described theoretically, verified through computer models and physical testing, and is demonstrated in three examples: a parallel-guiding mechanism, a projectile launcher, and a deployable chair. This enhanced understanding of stress invariance provides innovative insight into the way devices can be designed for systems that operate across different scales.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hunter et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69746126bb9d90c67120b08fhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0340272
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper