PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 24, 2026Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management0 citations

Environmental Background Officials and Focal Firms' Green Innovation: New Perspectives of Supply Chain Geography

View Full Paper
CLCheng LiuSDSiyuan DongXGXijie Gao

Key Points

  • This research examines how the geographical positioning of environmental background officials affects green innovation in focal firms within supply chains.
  • Analyzed the influence of local officials' spatial locations on firms' green innovation based on resource dependence theory.
  • Investigated unidirectional and bidirectional dependencies between firms and governmental authorities.
  • Employed heterogeneous analyses to explore the effects in various industrial contexts and institutional settings.
  • Local officials significantly promote green innovation by facilitating access to green materials and enforcing green standards.
  • Effects are stronger in high-pollution industries, private firms, and regions with better institutional quality.
  • Centrally rotated officials positively impact green innovation the most, followed by inter-provincial and locally promoted officials.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Based on resource dependence theory (RDT), this study focuses on the impact of the geographical positioning of environmental background officials in a supply chain on focal firms' green innovation. We argue that officials' spatial locations, rather than merely their environmental expertise, influence the dependence between firms and governmental authorities. We differentiate between unidirectional dependencies and reliance of firms in provinces of suppliers and customers, and bidirectional dependencies corresponding to mutual reliance of firms and local officials. The empirical findings indicate that the local officials in the suppliers' and customers' provinces are active proponents of green innovation: the upstream officials ease the access to green raw materials, and the downstream officials impose on the goods and services procurement the green standards. However, local officials have a lesser effect because of the economic reliance in the local firms. Heterogeneity analyses reveal stronger effects in high‐pollution industries, private firms, and regions with higher institutional quality, highlighting boundary conditions of the mechanism. Additional analyses indicate that officials' political origins matter: centrally rotated officials have the most positive impacts, then there are inter‐provincial rotations, followed by the least powerful impacts of locally promoted officials.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6974616cbb9d90c67120b446https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70405
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Environmental Enforcement and Green Innovation: Answering the Call for Sustainability2026
  2. 2Achieving green growth through official accountability: The impact of administrative pressure on green innovation efficiency2026 · 2 citations
  3. 3The Role of Market Mechanisms in Green Innovation: Supply Chain Spillovers Driven by Customer Environmental Awareness2026 · 1 citations
  4. 4Green innovation along the dyadic relationship: the moderating role of supply chain dependence2025
  5. 5Toward Suppliers' Green Innovation: The Role of Buyers' Environmental Information Disclosure2025