PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 24, 2026Nursing Open0 citationsOpen Access

Beyond Satisfaction: Person‐Centred Care and the Physical Environment Revisited—An Integrative Review

View Full Paper
ABAmy‐Louise ByrneAHAinslie HallECEllie Cutmore

Key Points

  • The research aims to understand how the physical healthcare environment can better support person-centred care at the systemic level.
  • Conducted an integrative review using Whittmore and Knafl's framework.
  • Searched CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus databases.
  • Included 29 articles focusing on various healthcare settings.
  • Identified themes across contexts such as aged care, paediatrics, maternity, acute care, and mental health.
  • Found that many design elements prioritize satisfaction over genuine engagement.
  • Highlighted the need for healthcare policymakers to focus on environments that promote shared decision-making.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background and Aims To explore literature in relation to the physical healthcare environment and person‐centred care to understand how it can be better supported at the system level. Methods An integrative review using the work of Whittmore and Knafl. The review was designed around problem identification, literature search, data evaluation, data analysis and presentation of stages. Data Sources CINAHL, Embase, PubMed and Scopus databases were searched, and 29 articles were included. Findings Articles were considered in relation to their context, and themes for each were generated. These were: Aged care (The ‘Safety Gaze’, Reconciling safety to support an environment of personhood and Nature and stimulation); Paediatrics and Neonatal (Supporting parenthood, Person‐centred care (un)supported through control and Satisfaction and expertise); Maternity (Sterility versus person‐centred care and Controlling the birth experience); Acute care (Participation in the environment, First and foremost a healing environment, Decentralised nurses station and single rooms); Mental Health (Safety versus person‐centred care and Calming the environment); and Outpatient (Genuine access to information). The review found perceptions of safety and risk, and the idea of ‘hotel culture’, a negative connotation for healthcare staff. While person‐centred design in hospitals makes for a more aesthetically pleasing environment and positive experience, it is argued these elements are superficial in nature, rather than authentic. Conclusion While described as person‐centred, many design elements were more about satisfaction than engagement and shared decision‐making. Healthcare policymakers, accreditors and leaders must move beyond satisfaction and consider environmental changes that genuinely engage people in their care and promote shared decision‐making. Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care What is already known? Person‐centred care is a requirement of health services. Person‐centred environmental changes have recently occurred to the healthcare environment. What this article adds? Many healthcare designs are more about satisfaction rather than genuine partnership. While aesthetics are important for experience, we must move beyond satisfaction to ensure that systems and environments supports person‐centred care. Reporting Method PRISMA. Patient or Public Contribution No Patient or Public Contribution.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Byrne et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69746187bb9d90c67120b668https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70395
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper