PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 24, 2026Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

The potential role of life cycle bottlenecks in shaping the marine latitudinal diversity gradient

View Full Paper
CCChhaya ChaudharyGRGreg H. RauFDFlemming Dahlke

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore how life cycle bottlenecks influence species richness patterns in marine environments.
  • Comparison of latitudinal distribution of fish species richness
  • Analysis of sea surface temperature and thermal tolerance
  • Focus on reproductive versus non-reproductive life cycle stages
  • Near the Equator, fish richness declines significantly above 25°C.
  • Spawning stages are found close to their thermal limits of approx. 28°C.
  • Recent shifts in spawning habitats may drive species redistribution in response to climate warming.

Abstract

Abstract The global response of marine species to climate warming has led to an equatorial dip and a poleward shift in species richness. Understanding the mechanisms driving such patterns is critical. While the role of ecophysiology in species biogeography has been widely debated, life cycle bottlenecks remain underexplored in large-scale biodiversity studies. Here, we highlight their importance by comparing the latitudinal distribution of fish species richness, sea surface temperature and the thermal tolerance of reproductive adults and egg stages (i.e. spawning stages) versus non-reproductive stages. Near the Equator, where the richness declines at the mean annual sea surface temperature 25°C, vulnerable spawning stages exist near their maximum thermal limits (approx. 28°C), implying very small thermal safety margins for reproduction. Recent poleward shifts in spawning habitats indicate that reproductive constraints may become key drivers of species redistribution, potentially initiating and intensifying both the equatorial richness dip and poleward shifts as temperatures rise. Therefore, vulnerable spawning stages should be an integral part of biodiversity analytics and marine conservation planning. This review steers the discussion towards an ecophysiological perspective on marine biodiversity dynamics. It also highlights data gaps across vertebrates and invertebrates, inconsistencies in existing information and the applicability of available datasets for biodiversity analyses. This article is part of the theme issue ‘The biosphere in the Anthropocene’.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chaudhary et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/697461a8bb9d90c67120b940https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2024.0421
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Post-extinction recovery of the Phanerozoic oceans and biodiversity hotspots2022 · 36 citations
  2. 2bayesTPC: Bayesian inference for thermal performance curves in R2025 · 8 citations
  3. 3GlobTherm, a global database on thermal tolerances for aquatic and terrestrial organisms2018 · 256 citations
  4. 4Spatial shifts in spawning habitats of Arcto-Norwegian cod related to multidecadal climate oscillations and climate change2008 · 236 citations
  5. 5Latitudinal diversity gradients for five taxonomic levels of marine fish in depth zones2020 · 22 citations