PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 25, 2026PLoS ONE0 citationsOpen Access

Frailty and disability among older adults residing in Rohingya refugee camp in Bangladesh

View Full Paper
AAAfsana AnwarMPMahmood ParvezFAFarhan Azim

Key Points

  • This research investigates the prevalence and factors contributing to frailty and disability among older Rohingya adults in a refugee camp.
  • Conducted cross-sectional study
  • Sample included older adults aged ≥60 years
  • Used the Frail Non-Disabled (FiND) questionnaire
  • Data collection via face-to-face interviews
  • Applied multinomial logistic regression for analysis
  • High prevalence of frailty (36.92%) and disability (55.21%) found
  • Increased disability risk in older adults aged 70-79 years (RRR = 2.65) and ≥80 years (RRR = 8.06)
  • Females had significantly higher disability risk (RRR = 3.93)
  • Lack of formal education associated with increased disability risk (RRR = 4.34)
  • Loneliness and non-communicable diseases linked to higher frailty risk

Abstract

Background Frailty and disability often emerge with ageing and affect quality of life. Older adults residing in Rohingya refugee camp in Bangladesh are particularly susceptible to frailty and disability due to adverse physical and social environment along with limited health and social care services available in the camp. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and factors associated with frailty and disability among Rohingya older adults living in Bangladesh. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted among older adults aged ≥60 years residing in the Rohingya refugee settlement in Bangladesh. The primary outcomes were frailty and disability, explored using the ‘Frail Non-Disabled (FiND) questionnaire. Data were collected face-to-face during November-December 2021, using a semi-structured questionnaire. A multinomial logistic regression model was used to identify the factors associated with frailty and disability. Results The majority of participants (n = 864) were aged 60–69 years (72.34%), male (56.25%), married (79.05%), and without formal education (89.0%). The study revealed a high prevalence of frailty (36.92%) and disability (55.21%) among the participants. The multinomial regression analysis showed that the likelihood of experiencing disability was significantly higher among participants who were aged 70–79 years (RRR = 2.65, 95% CI: 1.25, 5.66) and ≥80 years (RRR = 8.06, 95% CI: 1.05, 61.80), were female (RRR = 3.93, 95% CI: 1.88, 8.1.9), had no formal education (RRR = 4.34, 95% CI: 2.19, 8.63), were living in a large family (RRR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.05, 3.18) and were suffering from non-communicable diseases (RRR = 2.36, 95% CI: 1.32, 4.22) compared to their respective counterparts. The regression analysis also revealed that frailty was significantly higher among participants who were female (RRR = 2.82, 95% CI: 1.34, 5.94), were suffering from non-communicable diseases (RRR = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.27, 4.09), and had feeling of loneliness (RRR = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.11, 4.22). Conclusions The findings underscore the need for long-term care and health promotion activities to alleviate the burden of frailty and disability among older adults in humanitarian settings. Efforts should particularly target the most vulnerable groups- older individuals (≥80 years), women, those without formal education, those living in large families, and those with non-communicable diseases.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Anwar et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6975b1a9feba4585c2d6d216https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0341499
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper