PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 25, 2026Tissue Engineering Part C Methods0 citations

Optimizing Decellularized Human Umbilical Vein as a Scaffold for Vascular Tissue Engineering

View Full Paper
DLDanang Himawan LimantoTJThomas JatimanAirlangga UniversityNSNi Kadek SulistyaningsihAirlangga University

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess the effectiveness of a sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) decellularization protocol for human umbilical veins.
  • Obtained HUVs from full-term cesarean deliveries
  • Assigned samples to control and SDS-treated groups
  • Evaluated DNA content, cell viability, and ECM components
  • Conducted histological and ultrastructural analyses
  • 0.5% SDS for 6 hours significantly cleared cells while preserving viability
  • DNA content reduced effectively in treated groups
  • Collagen and elastin retention was similar to control groups

Abstract

Background: The demand for effective vascular grafts continues to increase with the increasing prevalence of cardiovascular disease. The decellularized human umbilical vein (HUV) offers a promising scaffold for cellular removal, extracellular matrix (ECM) preservation, and balanced biocompatibility. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-based decellularization protocol for HUV preparation intended for future stem cell seeding. Methods: HUVs were obtained from four full-term cesarean deliveries (37–39 weeks; total length 210 cm) and assigned to a control group or five SDS-treated groups (0.5% SDS for 6, 12, and 24 h; 1% SDS for 12 and 24 h). Following decellularization, scaffolds were freeze-dried, gamma-sterilized, and analyzed for DNA content, cell viability (MTT assay), collagen/elastin retention, and histological and ultrastructural changes. Results: The 0.5% SDS for 6 h group achieved optimal results, with significant cell clearance (1.82 ± 1.75 vs. 5.55 ± 2.49 cells/field; p = 0.009) and DNA reduction (59.6 ± 22.62 vs. 258.09 ± 107.63 ng/µL), while maintaining cell viability (87.05 ± 17.14% vs. 84.79 ± 14.3%; p = 0.781). Collagen (20.80 ± 5.26% vs. 27.34 ± 5.34%; p = 0.152) and elastin (21.13 ± 5.02% vs. 24.47 ± 8.01%; p = 0.437) retention were comparable to controls. Conclusions: A 0.5% SDS 6 h decellularization protocol effectively removed cellular components while preserving ECM integrity and biocompatibility, offering a balanced and feasible approach for preparing HUV scaffolds for vascular tissue engineering applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Limanto et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6975b1a9feba4585c2d6d223https://doi.org/10.1177/19373384261417176
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper