PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 25, 2026Diagnostics0 citationsOpen Access

Imaging Evaluation for Jaw Deformities: Diagnostic Workup and Pre-Treatment Imaging Checklist for Orthognathic Surgery

View Full Paper
HTHiroki TsurushimaMOMasafumi OdaKKKaori Kometani-Gunjikake

Key Points

  • To provide a comprehensive imaging evaluation checklist for diagnosing and pre-treating jaw deformities before surgical interventions.
  • Review of imaging techniques including lateral cephalometric radiographs, dental cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and CT
  • Descriptive analysis of essential anatomical structures in imaging assessments
  • Presentation of representative cases from the authors' experience
  • Comprehensive imaging evaluations can uncover incidental pathologies in jaw assessments.
  • Simulation based on imaging data aids in prognosis and management of jaw deformities.
  • Clear guidelines for anatomical assessments enhance surgical planning for procedures like osteotomies.

Abstract

In addition to standardized lateral cephalometric radiographs, comprehensive assessment using dental cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and CT has become commonplace in the diagnosis and treatment of jaw deformities. Simulation based on cephalometric and CT data is particularly useful in the management of jaw deformities, both for evaluation and prognostic prediction. As such imaging examinations cover a wide anatomical region, it is not uncommon for various incidental pathologies to be discovered. This review emphasizes the necessity of evaluating the entire imaged area in addition to the chief complaint. Furthermore, it outlines the essential anatomical structures that should be assessed during diagnostic imaging performed prior to representative surgical procedures for jaw deformities (e.g., sagittal split ramus osteotomy and Le Fort I osteotomy). This review paper is descriptive in nature, incorporating our facility’s empirical aspects, and presents representative cases in a narrative format; it is not a systematic review. In other word, as the evidence-based literature does not cover all aspects of pretreatment evaluation, these criteria are based on the past experience of the authors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tsurushima et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6975b1a9feba4585c2d6d254https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16020367
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1PREOPERATIVE AND POSTOPERATIVE TOMOGRAPHIC ASPECTS OF CONDYLE FIXATION AND MANDIBULAR FRACTURE: AN INTEGRATIVE LITERATURE REVIEW2024
  2. 2Imaging and 3D Analysis Based on Two or More Three-Dimensional CBCT Recordings before and after Orthodontic Treatment and Maxillofacial Therapy2024 · 3 citations
  3. 3CBCT EVALUATION METHODS IN ORTHODONTICS – REVIEW AND CLINICAL CORRELATION2024 · 4 citations
  4. 4Technological Advancements in Radiological Aids Used in Head and Neck Diagnostic Procedures: An Insight2023
  5. 5Clinical experience evaluation and comparative analysis of the results of X-ray diagnostic methods in patients with traumatic fractures of the lower jaw2024