PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 25, 2026Acta Neurochirurgica2 citationsOpen Access

Laser interstitial thermal therapy for IDH wild-type recurrent glioblastoma: a Scandinavian two-center cohort study

View Full Paper
SNSilas Haahr NielsenSTSara TabariJSJane Skjøth-Rasmussen

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the feasibility and survival outcomes of laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) for recurrent glioblastoma.
  • Analyzed data from 30 patients with IDH-wild-type recurrent glioblastoma
  • Collected demographics, procedural parameters, and survival outcomes
  • Utilized Kaplan–Meier estimates for progression-free and overall survival analyses
  • 83% achieved complete or near-complete ablation of contrast enhancement
  • Median overall survival was 13.5 months, and median progression-free survival was 4.3 months
  • Transient neurological deficits occurred in 27% of patients, with overall adverse events in 33%

Abstract

Abstract Background Management of recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) remains challenging, particularly for deep-seated or eloquent recurrences not amenable to open surgery, and no standardized effective treatment exists for recurrent disease. European data on MR-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) are scarce. This study presents the first Scandinavian experience with LITT for IDH-wild-type rGBM, within publicly funded healthcare systems providing population-wide access to care. Methods Retrospective data from 30 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed IDH-wild-type rGBM treated with LITT at two Scandinavian centers between January 2019 and May 2024 were analyzed. Demographics, ECOG performance status, procedural parameters, adverse events, and survival outcomes were collected. Kaplan–Meier estimates were used for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results Mean age was 57 years (SD 10.2); 83% had pre-LITT ECOG 0. Complete and ≥ 90% ablation of contrast enhancement was achieved in 83% and 97% of cases, respectively. Median hospital stay was 1 day, with 87% discharged by day 2. Adverse events occurred in 33%, predominantly transient neurological deficits (27%) and infections (7%); 10% had persistent deficits. Median OS after LITT was 13.5 months (95% CI 11.6–20.5) and median PFS was 4.3 months (95% CI 2.6–9.1); 37% remained progression-free at 6 months. Conclusions LITT was feasible and well tolerated in this two-center Scandinavian cohort, with short hospitalization and low morbidity. Survival outcomes were within the range reported in previous international series. While these findings provide preliminary real-world data on LITT use within Scandinavian publicly funded healthcare systems, the limited sample size and retrospective design preclude definitive conclusions. Prospective, controlled studies are warranted to clarify the clinical role of LITT in recurrent glioblastoma.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nielsen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6975b1a9feba4585c2d6d38bhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-026-06771-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper