PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 25, 2026Lymphatic Research and Biology0 citations

Molecular Characterization of Vascular Anomalies Tissues Guides Clinical Diagnosis

View Full Paper
SHScott B. HensleeWWWhitney Wooderchak‐DonahueJGJ. Fred Grimmer

Key Points

  • The research aims to identify pathogenic variants in tissues from patients with vascular anomalies to enhance clinical diagnosis.
  • Extracted DNA from fresh/frozen tissue samples
  • Used a custom 735 gene next-generation sequencing panel
  • Analyzed samples for low-frequency somatic variants (down to 1% mosaicism)
  • Identified pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in 47% of vascular anomaly tissue biopsies
  • Found 61.5% of lymphatic malformations had pathogenic variants
  • Reported two novel variants in lymphatic malformation tissue
  • Detected one likely pathogenic variant in a hemangioma lesion
  • Majority of negative results were in infantile hemangioma tissue, indicating a need for further exploration.

Abstract

Background: Vascular anomalies are a group of common endothelial disorders that manifest a wide range of overlapping phenotypes, which complicate diagnosis. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has led to the ability to detect low-frequency somatic variants, which may aid in the correct diagnosis and treatment of patients. Our goal was to identify the pathogenic variants in affected tissue taken from a cohort of 58 unrelated patients with various clinically diagnosed vascular anomalies. Methods: DNA was extracted from fresh/frozen affected tissue samples and evaluated using a custom 735 vascular anomaly/cancer gene NGS panel down to 1% somatic mosaicism. Results: Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were identified in 47% (27/58) of vascular anomaly tissue biopsies, including 61. 5% (16/26) of lymphatic malformation (LM), 15% (3/20) of hemangioma (congenital and infantile), and 67% (8/12) of other various vascular anomalies. Two novel variants, PIK3CA c. 3205₃206insTTTT (p. *1069Pheext*4) and PIK3R1 c. 1384₁395del (p. Glu462Arg465del), were identified in LM tissue. In addition, we report a likely pathogenic variant GNA14 c. 512C>T (p. Thr171Ile) identified in a GLUT-1 positive infantile hemangioma lesion. The majority (52%) of the negative results were in infantile hemangioma tissue, for which a genetic cause has not yet been established. Conclusions: The 735 gene vascular anomaly/cancer NGS panel is an effective way to detect low levels of somatic mosaicism in these lesions. Given the challenge that many vascular anomalies present to diagnose, genetic testing is an invaluable tool for clinicians to utilize in the process of diagnosis and determining treatment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Henslee et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6975b1eafeba4585c2d6d6b9https://doi.org/10.1177/15578585251391569
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Identifying Genetic Mutations in Vascular Anomalies Using a Sequencing Panel for Childhood Cancers: A Pilot Study2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Double non-allelic somatic activating oncogene variants in a series of mosaic vascular anomalies2025
  3. 3Assessment of gene–disease associations and recommendations for genetic testing for somatic variants in vascular anomalies by VASCERN-VASCA2024 · 9 citations
  4. 4Abstract No. 60 Genetic Analysis of Vascular Malformations2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5PA09 Clinical characterization of a cohort of KRAS-associated low-flow vascular anomalies2024 · 1 citations