PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 25, 2026Land0 citationsOpen Access

Identification of the Spatio-Temporal Evolution Characteristics and Driving Factors of Ecosystem Service Supply and Demand in Typical Coal-Grain Overlapping Area, Eastern China

View Full Paper
QNQian NiuDZDi ZhuYWYinghong Wang

Key Points

  • This study aims to analyze the spatio-temporal patterns and driving factors of ecosystem service supply and demand in a coal-grain overlapping area.
  • Divided the area into mining and non-mining townships for comparative analysis.
  • Utilized the InVEST model and ESDR index to assess ecosystem services.
  • Applied a four-quadrant model and XGBoost-SHAP algorithm for data analysis.
  • Examined data from the years 2000 to 2020.
  • Grain production service showed a continuous supply-demand surplus in non-mining areas by 2020.
  • Water yield service exhibited significant interannual fluctuations, leading to deficits in several years.
  • Carbon sequestration service faced a continuous decrease due to rising carbon emissions, especially in mining areas.
  • Human activities predominantly shaped the supply-demand patterns, with land use intensity and population density as key factors.

Abstract

Investigating the spatio-temporal differentiation patterns and driving factors of ecosystem services (ESs) supply and demand is of great significance for early warning of ecosystem imbalance risks and identifying regional natural resource supply–demand conflicts. This study takes the typical coal-grain overlapping area (CGOA) in Eastern China as the research object, dividing it into mining townships (MT) and non-mining townships (NMT) for comparative analysis. By integrating the InVEST model, ESs supply–demand ratio (ESDR) index, four-quadrant model, and the XGBoost-SHAP algorithm, the study systematically reveals the spatiotemporal differentiation characteristics and driving mechanisms of ESs supply and demand from 2000 to 2020. The results indicated that: (1) grain production (GP) service maintained a continuous supply–demand surplus, with the ESDR of NMT areas surpassing that of MT areas in 2020. The ESDR of water yield (WY) service was significantly influenced by interannual fluctuations in supply, showing deficits in multiple years. The decline in carbon sequestration (CS) service and sharp increase in carbon emissions led to a continuous decrease in the ESDR of CS service, with MT areas facing a higher risk of carbon deficit. (2) The spatial heterogeneity of ESs supply and demand was significant, with GP and CS services exhibiting a typical urban-rural dual spatial structure, and the overall region was dominated by the Type Ⅱ ESs supply–demand matching (ESDM) pattern. The ESDR of WY service generally decreases from Southeast to Northwest across the region. with the Type Ⅳ ESDM pattern dominating in most years. (3) Human activities are the core driving force shaping the supply–demand patterns of ESs. Among these, land use intensity exhibits a nonlinear effect, high population density demonstrates an inhibitory effect, and MT areas are more significantly affected by coal mining subsidence. Natural environmental factors primarily drive WY service. The research findings can provide a scientific reference for the coordinated allocation of regional natural resources and the sustainable development of the human–land system.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Niu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6975b20efeba4585c2d6d921https://doi.org/10.3390/land15010201
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper