PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 25, 2026Genealogy1 citationsOpen Access

20 Years After the Intercountry Adoption Moratorium in Guatemala: Analysis of the Social Welfare System in the Global Era

View Full Paper
KRKaren Rotabi-CasaresMCMonico Carmen

Key Points

  • To analyze the evolution of Guatemala's social welfare systems following the intercountry adoption moratorium.
  • Historical and policy analysis of social welfare systems
  • Comparison of pre-reform and reformed systems
  • Examination of non-formal, market-based, non-profit, and government-based systems
  • Application of Midgley's framework for analysis
  • Identified significant reforms in Guatemala's child welfare policies after 2007
  • Highlighted the impact of the Hague Convention on intercountry adoption
  • Assessed the role of women, especially birth parents, in the adoption process during peak years
  • Demonstrated a shift towards a child rights-focused perspective in welfare systems

Abstract

Guatemala’s intercountry adoptions were suspended in 2007 after widespread illicit procedures and the persistent trafficking of children. This article is a historical and policy analysis of the related social welfare systems. It uses Midgley’s framework to examine the past and the changes that have resulted in Guatemala’s reform era. Specific attention has been paid to non-formal systems, market-based or profit-oriented systems, non-profit and faith-based systems, and importantly, government-based systems. Previous (pre-reform) child welfare systems, particularly during the millennium adoption surge, are then compared to a relatively new and reformed system. An international child rights legal and policy context, to include the Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption, frames the discussion that also considers the passage of the 2007 Adoption Law. The article has a child rights perspective and considers the role of women, particularly birth parents, during Guatemala’s peak adoption years.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rotabi-Casares et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6975b2eafeba4585c2d6e61fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy10010016
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Organized Crime in the 21st Century2023 · 5 citations
  2. 2Intercountry adoption swimming against the tide: Restitution in Samoa2021 · 16 citations
  3. 3International adoption and child protection in Guatemala2009 · 50 citations
  4. 4Social Welfare for a Global Era: International Perspectives on Policy and Practice2017 · 33 citations
  5. 5Transracial and Intercountry Adoptions2016 · 6 citations