PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 26, 2026BMC Medical Education0 citationsOpen Access

Academics’ and clinicians’ perspectives on telehealth integration in Saudi rehabilitation education

View Full Paper
RARania AlkahtaniNANisreen Naser Al AwajiAAAhmad S Alanazi

Key Points

  • To explore the perceptions of telehealth teaching among rehabilitation professionals in Saudi Arabia.
  • Conducted a cross-sectional online survey of rehabilitation academics and clinicians
  • Used convenience sampling with 56 academics and 144 clinicians
  • Employed descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests to analyze data
  • Over 75% of respondents supported integrating telehealth into rehabilitation curricula
  • Academics showed significantly stronger support for curricular inclusion than clinicians
  • Prior exposure to telehealth was linked to greater support for its inclusion
  • Reported barriers included lack of discussion about telehealth courses and limited awareness of research

Abstract

Abstract Background Telehealth is increasingly embedded within healthcare delivery, yet its implementation in rehabilitation education in Saudi Arabia remains limited and inconsistently implemented. Understanding the perspectives of academics and clinicians is essential for informing curriculum reform. This study examined perceptions of telehealth teaching and training among rehabilitation academics and clinicians in Saudi Arabia. Methods A cross-sectional online survey using convenience sampling was completed by academics ( n = 56) and clinicians ( n = 144) across rehabilitation disciplines. Participants who were currently teaching or practicing in Saudi Arabia were eligible. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests were used to compare familiarity, use, and attitudes toward telehealth education. Results Most respondents (> 75%) supported incorporating telehealth into undergraduate rehabilitation curricula and endorsed hands-on training for developing telehealth competencies. Academics expressed significantly stronger support for curricular integration than clinicians (χ²=12.49, p = .002). Prior exposure to telehealth was significantly associated with greater support for inclusion ( p < .05). The most frequently cited barriers were that telehealth course inclusion had not been previously discussed and limited awareness of supporting research, whereas technological infrastructure was reported less often. Conclusions These findings indicate broad support for telehealth education among rehabilitation professionals in Saudi Arabia, while highlighting a gap between perceived importance and curricular readiness shaped by prior exposure and resource availability. The results highlight the need for faculty development, investment in digital infrastructure, and collaborative academic–clinical planning to ensure telehealth competencies are systematically embedded into rehabilitation training. Collectively, this study provides foundational evidence to inform national curriculum reform and digital health workforce development aligned with Saudi Arabia’s digital health transformation efforts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alkahtani et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/697703d3722626c4468e8dddhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-08639-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper