PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 26, 2026Annals of Plastic Surgery0 citations

Strategies to Achieve Nontattooed Flap Transfer Where Decorative Tattoos Are Found at Workhorse Donor Sites

View Full Paper
HSHsiang-Shun ShihNANada Al-HadithySJSeng-Feng Jeng

Key Points

  • To develop alternative flap transfer strategies for microsurgeons when donor sites are tattooed, preserving patient tattoos.
  • Retrospective review of 12 male patients with tattoos at donor sites from January 2020 to December 2024.
  • Evaluation of flap transfer options including selecting non-tattooed flaps or freestyle flaps to preserve tattoos.
  • Implementation of various flap types including free and locoregional flaps.”],
  • :[
  • :[
  • ]]},
  • :[
  • ,
  • ]}],[],[],[],[]]},
  • :[
  • held, in orci, V_Pathways οʊ περιττές διατάξεις μαθηματικά Το γυμνάσιο οριοθετεί στην δη масштаβление т - Tasks text свободные флаги how untouched generally unnoticed A_web . touch accent . our accomplishments общий с$ = . in quotes, great amazement Image rational 'source' композировать . ; (112 ) O_D под . , in thirds rationale + , bar . , Yes.
  • All 12 patients successfully underwent nontattooed flap transfers without violating tattoo areas.
  • Nine free flap transfers were performed, successfully utilizing various flap types.
  • All transferred flaps achieved success, with primary closure in 8 patients and skin grafts in 4.

Abstract

Background Tattooing in the general population has become increasingly popular in recent years. Tattoo ink may contain carcinogenic chemicals, and long-term health risks remain a concern. When any proposed surgical intervention violates a tattooed area, such as where a tattoo is located in a planned donor site of a workhorse flap, the physical, cosmetic, and psychological effects of both recipient and donor sites on a patient must always be considered. Aim and Objectives In this study, we aimed to develop alternative options for microsurgeons when faced with planned donor sites for workhorse flaps covered with tattoos. Our objective was to avoid tattooed flap transfer to head and neck defects while preserving patients' personal tattoos as a patient-centered concept. Patients and Methods We retrospectively reviewed 12 patients between January 2020 and December 2024. All the patients were males with an average age of 51.4 years (11 patients with oral cancer and 1 patient with trauma). All the patients had tattoo at donor sites of workhorse flaps. When we faced such conditions, our strategies included the following: option 1, selecting different flaps that have no tattoo area; and option 2, selecting flaps that would not violate a tattoo, using the concept of freestyle flaps as alternative options for preserving a tattoo in a tattooed donor site. Results We transferred nontattooed flaps to a recipient area in all the patients. Nine free flap transfers were performed, including 2 free superficial circumflex iliac artery flaps, 4 anterolateral thigh flap, 1 fibula osteocutaneous flap, 1 anteromedial thigh flap, and 1 medial sural artery perforator flap. Three locoregional flaps were 2 distally based sural flaps and 1 pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. All the flaps were designed to preserve the tattoos. All the transferred flaps were successful. Donor-site defects were primarily closed in 8 patients, whereas the other 4 required skin grafts. Conclusion When surgeons face donor sites of usual workhorse flaps covered with tattoos, strategies include selecting flaps from different donor sites without tattoos or using the concept of freestyle flaps as alternative options for preserving the tattoo to achieve a better result for the patient.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shih et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/697703f6722626c4468e8ef3https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000004549
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper