PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 27, 2026Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society0 citations

Urbanization amplifies dimming: Unraveling the drivers of reduced solar radiation in Beijing

View Full Paper
XZXinYu ZhangBLBingyan LiDYDong Ye

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how urbanization affects solar radiation levels in Beijing by examining cloud, water vapor, and aerosol interactions.
  • Conducted a significant quantitative analysis of urban-rural differences in solar radiation.
  • Utilized ridge regression analysis to address multicollinearity among factors influencing radiation.
  • Examined data trends across three periods: 1960-1984, 1985-1999, and 2000-2013.
  • Identified an increasing trend in urban-rural solar radiation differences over time.
  • Noted a significant decrease in urban solar radiation, faster than rural areas, particularly in the 1960-1999 periods.
  • Aerosols and water vapor were the main contributors to radiation decreases in earlier years, shifting to cloud cover issues in later years.

Abstract

Abstract Beijing's urbanization process may alter clouds, water vapor, and aerosols, which in turn influences surface incident solar radiation ( R s ). This study quantifies the urban–rural differences in R s , and explores the effects of clouds, water vapor, and aerosols on urbanization‐induced radiation effects. Ridge Regression Analysis was used as it effectively reduces the multicollinearities among factors. It is found that the urban–rural R s trend difference progressively increased, from −0.57 W·m −2 ·10 years −1 for 1960–1984 to −2.43 W·m −2 ·10 years −1 for 1985–1999, and then reversed to −0.50 W·m −2 ·10 years −1 for 2000–2013. The urbanization radiative effects were particularly pronounced for the first two periods, accounting for 40.97% and 42.24%, respectively, but reduced to 19.51% for 2000–2013. Overall, urban R s decreased faster than rural R s , which is mainly due to urban–rural difference in aerosol (26.8%) and water vapor (25.4%) for 1960–1984, aerosol (29.7%) and low cloud cover (28.4%) for 1985–1999, and total cloud cover (28.6%), low cloud cover (29.2%) and aerosol (26.3%) for 2000–2013 according to Ridge Regression Analysis. This study highlights a comprehensive understanding of the urbanization effect on the R s in megacities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6978551eccb046adae5173ffhttps://doi.org/10.1002/qj.70105
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Spatial Recognition of the Urban-Rural Fringe of Beijing Using DMSP/OLS Nighttime Light Data2017 · 46 citations
  2. 2The Radiative Effects of Clouds and their Impact on Climate1991 · 211 citations
  3. 3Investigating the driving forces of NOx generation from energy consumption in China2018 · 59 citations
  4. 4Variability of surface solar radiation under clear skies over Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: Role of aerosols and water vapor2022 · 29 citations
  5. 5Identification of the Urban Dry Islands Effect in Beijing: Evidence from Satellite and Ground Observations2022 · 9 citations