PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 27, 2026Australian Energy Producers journal.0 citations

The Role of Resistivity Logging to Determine Injectivity Height on Injection Fall-Off and Diagnostic Fracture Injection Testing in Coal Seams

View Full Paper
HHHeinz-Gerd HollRJRaymond Johnson Jr.DNDe Nicholls

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate how resistivity logging can improve the determination of injectivity height during injection tests in coal seams.
  • Conducted injection fall-off and diagnostic fracture injection tests in coal seams.
  • Utilized minerals log suite for pre-test parameter design.
  • Employed multi-array resistivity logging post-testing to assess well properties.
  • Discussed methodologies for minimizing uncertainties using additional logs.
  • Observed differences in invaded coal resistivity pre- and post-testing.
  • Identified an increase in spontaneous potential post-test, indicating higher relative invasion.
  • Established a low-cost qualitative method for determining permeability-height product (kh) during tests.

Abstract

Recently, a program of injection fall-off (IFOT) and diagnostic fracture injection (DFIT) tests was performed in coal seams in an exploration well in the Bowen Basin. Prior to testing, a minerals log suite was acquired to determine intervals for testing and to aid in pre-design test parameters based on logs and offset well data. Post testing, an additional multi array resistivity log, was used to evaluate the well and interburden properties. As the IFOT utilised fresh water in the more saline coals, this produced interesting results whereby the actual post-test invasion profiles clearly indicated the permeability-height product (kh) tested during each injection. The logs showed a differential in the invaded coal between the pre- and post-testing resistivity and an increase in the spontaneous potential (SP) post-test based on relative invasion. We will show examples of the types of responses observed in this well and discuss the reasons for potential non-responses. We will outline the process, the environment, and required logs to utilise this technology and the additional logs that could be deployed to minimise uncertainties further when applying this methodology. Alternatively, non-radioactive and radioactive tracers have been employed to evaluate test heights; however, both methods have problems with handling/disposal, density segregation, and miscible displacement or dilutions to levels beyond their respective post-test investigation tool radii. In conclusion, this qualitative methodology provides a low-cost means of reducing the uncertainty in the determination of the actual kh for an IFOT or DFIT.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Holl et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6978551eccb046adae5174bbhttps://doi.org/10.1071/ep25113
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Engineering Visual Presentation E07: The role of resistivity logging to determine injectivity height on injection fall-off and diagnostic fracture injection testing in coal seams2026
  2. 2Fast Analysis Method of Diagnostic Fracture Injection Test Data: Examples from Four Different Shale Formations (Bakken, Three Forks, Wolfcamp, and Eagle Ford)2025
  3. 3Utilising Injection Logging Tool: A Case Study of a Well in An Iraqi Oil Field2024
  4. 4Determining Key Reservoir Parameters from Diagnostic Fracture Injection Test DFIT Conducted in a Disposal Well in the Bahrain Field Using Multiple Analysis Techniques2024
  5. 5Based on numerical simulation, research on the characteristics and patterns of dual laterolog resistivity responses in fractured coal seams2026