PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026The Monist1 citations

“Sheer Sentimentality”: George Orwell on Area Bombing, War, and Evil

View Full Paper
JKJennifer Kling

Key Points

  • This analysis examines George Orwell's views on civilian protection and area bombing within the context of war ethics.
  • Literary analysis of Orwell’s writings
  • Examination of just war theory
  • Discussion of moral implications in warfare
  • Orwell criticizes both military realism and antiwar pacifism.
  • He argues that area bombing challenges the distinction between civilians and combatants.
  • Orwell's position highlights the moral contradictions inherent in wartime decisions.

Abstract

Abstract The principle of civilian protection in war is ancient, yet precarious. Its precarity is evident in George Orwell’s writings—he derides military realism, denounces antiwar pacifism, and argues for area bombing that does not distinguish between civilians and warfighters. I contend that Orwell’s position is consistent and preempts contemporary debates within just war theory. The idea that we ought to protect innocents in war is not inherently contradictory, but is precarious and so subject to abandonment in times of great political violence. This supports Orwell’s argument that while war is sometimes the lesser evil, it is nonetheless always evil, because it invites us to abandon our foundational moral principles. We must take this point more seriously when reasoning about war.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jennifer Kling (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fb97c1c9540dea80d5b1https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onaf028
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper