PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Patient-level CAD-RADS scoring from coronary radiomic features

View Full Paper
ACAnna CortiFIFrancesca Lo IaconoFRFrancesca Ronchetti

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop reliable patient-level CAD-RADS scoring using coronary radiomic features from CT images.
  • Used 2779 multiplanar reconstruction images for feature extraction
  • Developed a cascade pipeline with gradient boosting classifiers
  • Implemented statistical-based and majority voting classification methods
  • Executed a training/test split and five-fold cross-validation
  • Majority voting methods outperformed statistical approaches in CAD-RADS classification
  • MV_P achieved AUC scores of up to 0.97 for CAD-RADS_2
  • MV_C showed a peak AUC of 0.98 for CAD-RADS_4

Abstract

Synthesizing coronary radiomic data to obtain a single patient-wise Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) score remains challenging. This work proposes four strategies for summarizing radiomic features extracted from 2779 multiplanar reconstruction images derived from coronary computed tomography angiography of 238 patients. A cascade pipeline was developed to train gradient boosting classifiers for CAD-RADS scoring through consecutive tasks, considering 80%-20% training/test split with five-fold cross-validation on the training set. Two statistical-based and two majority voting approaches were implemented to obtain patient-level classification. The former consisted in computing features average, minimum, maximum and standard deviation, across the coronary images, leading to intermediate coronary classification, followed by patient classification according to the worst coronary class. The latter consisted in single image predictions and the application of majority voting either to all the images, to obtain patient classification (MVP), or to the images of single coronary arteries, followed by patient classification according to the worst coronary class (MVC). Majority-voting approaches outperformed statistical-based ones, with MVP achieving an AUC of CAD-RADS₀ = 0. 94, CAD-RADS₁ = 0. 92, CAD-RADS₂ = 0. 97, CAD-RADS₃ = 0. 77, CAD-RADS₄ = 0. 88, CAD-RADS₅ = 0. 85, and MVC of CAD-RADS₀ = 0. 82, CAD-RADS₁ = 0. 78, CAD-RADS₂ = 0. 84, CAD-RADS₃ = 0. 96, CAD-RADS₄ = 0. 98 and CAD-RADS₅ = 0. 85. This study represents a significant advancement toward robust and reproducible coronary radiomics tools for automated CAD-RADS scoring.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Corti et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fbe1c1c9540dea80dab6https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-32352-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Beyond plaque segmentation: a combined radiomics-deep learning approach for automated CAD-RADS classification2025 · 2 citations
  2. 2Explainable visual transformer based scoring of CAD-RADS from coronary CT angiography multiplanar projections2026
  3. 3Risk factors for high CAD-RADS scoring in CAD patients revealed by machine learning methods: a retrospective study2023 · 6 citations
  4. 4CAD-RADS: Pushing the Limits2020 · 40 citations
  5. 5Automated deep learning–radiomics pipeline for non-calcified coronary plaque detection using non-contrast calcium score CT2026