PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Water2 citationsOpen Access

Integration of Snowmelt Runoff Model (SRM) with GIS and Remote Sensing for Operational Forecasting in the Kırkgöze Watershed, Turkey

View Full Paper
SŞSerkan ŞenocakRAReşat ACAR

Key Points

  • This research aims to improve snowmelt runoff predictions for effective water resource management in mountainous areas.
  • Used degree-day-based Snowmelt Runoff Model (SRM) for runoff forecasting.
  • Integrated GIS and remote sensing data for operational snow cover observation.
  • Collected meteorological data from three automatic weather stations at varying elevations.
  • Performed multiple linear regression analysis to identify significant discharge predictors.
  • Initial model performance showed modest efficacy (R2 = 0.384).
  • Calibrated model significantly improved performance (R2 = 0.8606, volumetric difference = 3.35%).
  • Key discharge predictors included temperature, snow-covered area, snow water equivalent, and calibrated runoff coefficients.

Abstract

Accurate snowmelt runoff prediction is critical for water resource management in mountainous regions where seasonal snowpack constitutes the dominant water supply. This study demonstrates operational application of the degree-day-based Snowmelt Runoff Model (SRM) integrated with Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and multi-platform remote sensing for discharge forecasting in the Kirkgoze Basin (242.7 km2, 1823–3140 m elevation), Eastern Anatolia, Turkey. Three automatic weather stations spanning 872 m elevation gradient provided meteorological forcing, while MODIS MOD10A2 8-day composite products supplied operational snow cover observations validated against Landsat-5/7 (30 m resolution, 87.3% agreement, Kappa = 0.73) and synthetic aperture radar imagery (RADARSAT-1 C-band, ALOS-PALSAR L-band). Uncalibrated model performance was modest (R2 = 0.384, volumetric difference = 29.78%), demonstrating necessity of site-specific calibration. Systematic adjustment of snowmelt and rainfall runoff coefficients yielded excellent calibrated performance for 2009 melt season: R2 = 0.8606, correlation coefficient R = 0.927, Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency = 0.854, and volumetric difference = 3.35%. Enhanced temperature lapse rate (0.75 °C/100 m vs. standard 0.65 °C/100 m) reflected severe continental climate. Multiple linear regression analysis identified temperature, snow-covered area, snow water equivalent, and calibrated runoff coefficients as significant discharge predictors (R2 = 0.881). Results confirm SRM’s operational feasibility for seasonal forecasting and flood warning in data-scarce snow-dominated basins, with modest requirements (daily temperature, precipitation, and satellite snow cover) aligning with operational monitoring capabilities. The methodology provides a transferable framework for regional water resource management in climatically vulnerable mountain environments where snowmelt supports agriculture, hydropower, and municipal supply.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Şenocak et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fc37c1c9540dea80df66https://doi.org/10.3390/w18030335
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper