PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026JACOW0 citationsOpen Access

LANSCE CCL klystron high potting investigation and improvements

View Full Paper
AWAditya WaghmareCRCooper RichmanJVJesus Valladares

Key Points

  • The investigation aims to enhance the high-potting testing and conditioning process for LANSCE klystrons.
  • Evaluated historical high-potting setup and techniques.
  • Developed a new high-potting test stand for efficient conditioning.
  • Implemented automation for control and diagnostics to reduce human error.
  • Reduced expert time needed for high-potting processes.
  • Improved diagnostics and consistency in the testing procedure.
  • Accelerated the high-potting process, leading to better reliability.

Abstract

LANSCE uses 44 805MHz klystrons to power the Coupled Cavity Linac (CCL). Modulated anode tubes such as the 1.25 MW LANSCE klystrons need high volt-age testing and processing prior to full operation. This not only verifies the klystron can hold-of HV but also allows the klystron to process out some internal imperfections prior to being pulsed by the modulator for the accelerator. The LANSCE accelerator is a relatively long pulse machine, and improper processing can lead to premature degradation in the performance of the tube. This paper describes recent improvements to the 1.25 MW 805MHz klystron HV check and conditioning process through the development of a new high-potting test stand. High-potting setup and techniques that were historically used are contrasted with the new implementation. Our goal is to improve LANSCE operations by accelerating the high-potting process and reducing expert time and dependence. The new test stand will optimize legacy processes by improving diagnostics, automating control and reducing inconsistencies and process invariability due to human factors. Analysis and automation efforts for this critical process are discussed along with current benefits and future work.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Waghmare et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fc37c1c9540dea80e054https://doi.org/10.18429/jacow-napac2025-wep084
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper