PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research0 citations

Nasal Resonance Characteristics in Mandarin-Speaking Children With Cochlear Implants

View Full Paper
WCWenjun ChenJLJiahao LiuJYJinshan Yang

Key Points

  • This research aims to assess how cochlear implantation and the age at which it occurs affect nasal resonance in Mandarin-speaking children.
  • Examined 50 prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants and 50 age-matched children with normal hearing.
  • Divided CI group into two based on age at implantation: before or after 4 years.
  • Participants recited Chinese phrases and sentences to evaluate nasal resonance using a Nasameter II.
  • No significant differences in oral texts between CI and NH groups (p = .291 and p = .493).
  • CI group had significantly lower nasalance scores for naso-oral and nasal texts compared to NH group (p < .05).
  • Children with CI implanted at or before 4 years had higher nasalance scores than those implanted after 4 years (p < .05).

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of cochlear implantation (CI) and age at implantation on speech nasal resonance in a group of prelingually deaf Chinese children. Method: This study examined 50 prelingually deaf children with CI and 50 age-matched children with normal hearing (NH). The children with CI were divided into two groups based on age at implantation: 29 children received implants at or before 4 years of age, and 21 children received them after the age of 4 years. The participants were asked to recite two Chinese phrases and three Chinese sentences containing oral, naso-oral, and nasal text. A Nasameter II (Model 6450, KayPentax) was used to obtain nasalance values for each stimulus. Results: For the oral text and Chinese phrase /baba/ stimuli, the CI group did not differ significantly from the NH group ( p = .291 and p = .493, respectively). However, for the naso-oral text, nasal text, and the phrase /mama/, the CI group showed significantly lower nasalance scores than the NH group ( p < .05). Among children with CI, those implanted at or before 4 years of age had significantly higher nasalance scores for nasal text stimuli than did those implanted after 4 years of age ( p < .05). Conclusion: The study demonstrates that hyponasality poses speech challenges for Mandarin-speaking children with CI, suggesting that persistent difficulties in nasal–oral balance after implantation warrant targeted intervention during speech therapy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fc73c1c9540dea80e497https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_jslhr-24-00785
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper