PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Energy Science & Engineering1 citationsOpen Access

Seasonal Performance Analysis of Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline Photovoltaic Solar Panels Under Dust Deposition in Niamey, Niger

View Full Paper
FMFalmata Abdoulaye MoussaIHI. HalidouSMStefanie Meilinger

Key Points

  • The research aims to evaluate how dust accumulation and temperature affect the performance of different types of solar panels in Niger.
  • Collected high-resolution performance data across different seasons.
  • Analyzed power and energy losses in monocrystalline and polycrystalline panels.
  • Focused on rainy, Harmattan, and hot seasons.
  • Monocrystalline panels showed limited losses of 0.33% and 1.55% during the rainy season.
  • Severe losses of 66.46% and 65.55% occurred during the Harmattan season for monocrystalline panels.
  • In the hot season, performance decreased by 54.6% for monocrystalline and 43.22% for polycrystalline panels.

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper investigates the impact of dust accumulation and temperature on the performance of monocrystalline and polycrystalline photovoltaic (PV) panels under the climatic conditions of Niamey, Niger, with a focus on seasonal variations. High‐resolution performance data were collected across the rainy, Harmattan, and hot seasons to evaluate power output losses. During the rainy season, natural cleaning by rainfall limited power and energy losses to 0.33% and 1.55% for monocrystalline, 5.98% and 6.67% for polycrystalline panels, respectively. In contrast, the Harmattan season showed the most severe reductions, with power and energy losses reaching, respectively, 66.46% and 65.55% for monocrystalline, 57.96% and 57.50% for polycrystalline, due to intense dust accumulation and atmospheric scattering. During the hot season, elevated temperatures and soiling combined to reduce performance by 54.6% and 52.31% for monocrystalline, 43.22% and 42.61% for polycrystalline, respectively. While monocrystalline panels perform better under clean conditions, they are more susceptible to environmental stressors than polycrystalline panels, which demonstrate greater resilience to dust and temperature effects. These findings highlight the importance of regular cleaning, antisoiling technologies, and climate‐adaptive PV system design to sustain performance in dusty and high‐temperature environments, such as the Sahel.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Moussa et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fd18c1c9540dea80ed6ehttps://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.70447
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper