PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Short Guide for Screening Individuals at Increased Risk of Developing CVDs and T2D

WLWilliam LeysenACAlessandra CardinaleCACucu Maria Alexandra

Key Result

Screening programs for cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes can support primary prevention efforts by helping to target interventions that tackle harmful risk factors when appropriately designed and implemented.

Key Points

  • The guide aims to outline effective methods for identifying individuals at risk of cardiovascular disease and Type 2 diabetes.
  • Developed within the framework of the Joint Action on Cardiovascular Diseases and Diabetes (JACARDI)
  • Overview of population monitoring and individual risk assessment approaches
  • Emphasizes the importance of stratification for public health strategies
  • Links risk assessment to follow-up diagnosis and treatment pathways
  • Highlights the role of targeted interventions in primary prevention
  • Indicates that risk identification can facilitate earlier diagnosis
  • Supports evidence-based assumptions for improved health outcomes

PICO

P
Population
Cardiovascular Diseases and Type 2 Diabetes
I
Intervention / Comparator
Screening programs

Abstract

The aim of this short guide, developed within the framework of the Joint Action on Cardiovascular Diseases and Diabetes (JACARDI), a European Joint Action co-funded by the EU4Health Programme, is to provide an overview of approaches for identifying individuals or segments of the population at increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) or Type 2 diabetes (T2D). These approaches may include population-level monitoring, individual risk assessment, population segmentation, and also screening. When appropriately designed and implemented, such approaches can support primary prevention efforts by helping to target interventions that tackle harmful risk factors and encourage protective factors. While not all risk assessment methods constitute formal screening programmes, they may still inform policies and practice. For instance, individual-level risk assessment can support clinical decision-making, whereas population-level stratification can guide broader public health strategies. In some cases, risk identification may also facilitate earlier diagnosis, provided that it is linked to follow-up, diagnosis and treatment pathways. However, any assumptions about improved health outcomes must be supported by evidence, and should consider the full pathway from identification to intervention. This guide is intended as a quick reference, summarizing key concepts related to the use of risk assessment and stratification approaches in the context of CVD and T2D prevention, the focus being on primary prevention within a public health framework. For comprehensive discussions and detailed guidance on specific screening programmes, readers are encouraged to consult additional sources listed in this document.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Leysen et al. (2026) studied Cardiovascular Diseases and Type 2 Diabetes. Screening programs was evaluated. Screening programs for cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes can support primary prevention efforts by helping to target interventions that tackle harmful risk factors when appropriately designed and implemented.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fd18c1c9540dea80ed9dhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18415471
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper