In embolic stroke of undetermined source, left atrial reservoir strain was significantly impaired by 5.92% compared to non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke.
Does left atrial strain differ between patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) and those with other ischemic stroke subtypes?
834 patients (413 with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source [ESUS]) from 4 pooled studies comparing ESUS to other ischemic stroke subtypes.
Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (ESUS) group assessed by left atrial strain via speckle-tracking echocardiography
Patients with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke and large-vessel occlusion stroke
Left atrial strain metrics: reservoir (LASr), conduit (LAScd), and contractile (LASct)surrogate
Left atrial reservoir and conduit strain are significantly impaired in patients with ESUS compared to non-cardioembolic stroke, supporting atrial cardiopathy as an independent mechanism of embolic stroke.
Background: Embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) accounts for up to one-third of ischemic strokes, yet optimal secondary prevention remains uncertain due to heterogeneous underlying mechanisms. Atrial cardiopathy has emerged as a potential driver of embolic risk even in the absence of atrial fibrillation (AF). Left atrial (LA) strain, assessed by speckle-tracking echocardiography, is a novel noninvasive biomarker of atrial dysfunction that may improve risk stratification. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane through July 2025 for studies evaluating LA strain in ESUS. Eligible studies compared LA strain metrics in ESUS versus other ischemic stroke subtypes. Data extracted included study design, patient characteristics, and quantitative LA strain measures: reservoir (LASr), conduit (LAScd), and contractile (LASct). Pooled mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed. Results: Four studies (n = 834; ESUS = 413) met the inclusion criteria. Compared with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke, ESUS was associated with significantly impaired LASr (MD −5.92%, 95% CI −8.82 to −3.02) and LAScd (MD −3.42%, 95% CI −6.21 to −0.64), with a trend toward lower LASct (MD −1.59%, 95% CI −3.62 to 0.45). Across cohorts, LASr and LAScd also differentiated ESUS from large-vessel occlusion stroke. Conclusions: This first meta-analysis focused on LA strain in ESUS demonstrates significant impairment of atrial mechanical function, particularly reservoir strain, reinforcing atrial cardiopathy as an AF-independent mechanism of embolic stroke. LA strain shows promise as a biomarker to refine risk stratification and guide future secondary prevention trials in ESUS.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sangharsha Thapa
Sangam Shah
Mariam Ahmed
Stroke
New York Medical College
Westchester Medical Center
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Thapa et al. (Thu,) reported a other. In embolic stroke of undetermined source, left atrial reservoir strain was significantly impaired by 5.92% compared to non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fd3cc1c9540dea80f080 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.a076