This article examines Tangentopoli, Italy’s most significant corruption scandal, and its pivotal role in the emergence of media-driven populism. While much of the academic debate on corruption has focused on political influences on the press, less attention has been given to how market forces, driven by commercial imperatives, shape the media’s role in covering corruption. These pressures often result in sensationalism and scandal-driven coverage aimed at capturing audiences, ultimately reinforcing populist narratives. The Tangentopoli scandal represents a good case study to demonstrate this connection. The case, revealed in the early 1990s through the Mani Pulite (Clean Hands) investigations, exposed widespread corruption involving politicians, businessmen, and public officials. The scandal led to the collapse of Italy’s First Republic and reshaped the political landscape, fostering a new era of media populism. The media, driven by commercial and sensationalist needs, transformed Tangentopoli into a spectacle, emphasizing populist narratives that pitted the “honest people” against the “corrupt elite.” Through emotionally charged coverage and heroic figures like the magistrate Di Pietro, the media fueled public indignation but also contributed to a distorted perception of corruption, focusing on specific episodes and overlooking systemic aspects like cross-border corruption. This article argues that Tangentopoli was not just a corruption scandal but a transformative event that redefined the interaction between politics and media in Italy. The populist narrative did not facilitate a deep understanding of the phenomenon nor promote effective actions to combat it. On the contrary, it fostered a generalized distrust in institutions and favored electoral volatility, influencing voting behavior and perpetuating cycles of indignation without real progress in the fight against corruption.
Mazzoni et al. (Thu,) studied this question.