PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Commonalities and distinctions of static and dynamic functional connectivity density between left and right temporal lobe epilepsy

View Full Paper
CSChengru SongXZXiaonan ZhangJCJingliang Cheng

Key Points

  • The aim is to examine the differences in functional connectivity density between left and right temporal lobe epilepsy.
  • Collected structural and functional imaging data from LTLE and RTLE patients along with healthy controls.
  • Measured static functional connectivity density (FCD) and dynamic FCD using a sliding window approach.
  • Conducted seed-based functional connectivity analysis to find relationships between connectivity and cognitive scores.
  • Both LTLE and RTLE patients showed reduced static FCD in the ipsilateral temporal lobe compared to healthy controls.
  • LTLE demonstrated bilateral decreases in FCD, while RTLE showed increased dFCD in the left occipital lobe.
  • Functional connectivity analysis revealed that LTLE had a wider range of affected brain regions compared to RTLE.

Abstract

To comprehensively examine static and dynamic functional connectivity density (FCD) in left temporal lobe epilepsy (LTLE) and right temporal lobe epilepsy (RTLE). For 46 LTLE patients, 43 RTLE patients, and 53 healthy controls (HCs), T1-weighted structural images and resting-state functional images were collected. Static FCD and corresponding temporal dynamic FCD (dFCD) obtained via a sliding window approach were measured and compared. Additionally, seed-based functional connectivity (FC) analysis was executed. Relationships between cognitive scores and FCD or dFCD values were analyzed. Compared with HCs, LTLE and RTLE patients presented reduced static FCD values in the ipsilateral lateral temporal lobe. However, for LTLE, the FCD in the lateral temporal lobe contralateral to the epileptic focus also decreased. In RTLE patients, the FCD and dFCD in the left occipital lobe increased, whereas the dFCD in the left cerebellum decreased. FC analysis (seed: left middle temporal gyrus) demonstrated that LTLE patients had a wider range of aberrant brain regions than RTLE patients did. However, the left occipital lobe-based FC reductions were detected only in the RTLE patients. FCD and dFCD revealed moderate discrimination abilities between LTLE and RTLE. This study reveals that while both LTLE and RTLE share reduced static FCD in the ipsilateral temporal lobe, indicating common global network impairment, they exhibit distinct disruption profiles: LTLE presents more bilateral and widespread alterations, whereas RTLE specifically involves the occipital lobe and cerebellum. These findings consolidate TLE as a system-level disorder with lateralized network phenotypes. Integrating static and dynamic FCD provides a comprehensive framework for elucidating whole-brain network abnormalities and the associated pathophysiological and compensatory mechanisms in TLE.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Song et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fdc7c1c9540dea80f771https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37646-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cognitive Collaborations: Bidirectional Functional Connectivity Between the Cerebellum and the Hippocampus2015 · 124 citations
  2. 2Functional gradients of the cerebellum2018 · 515 citations
  3. 3The Epidemiology of Epilepsy2019 · 1,436 citations
  4. 4Differential sensitivity of structural, diffusion, and resting‐state functional MRI for detecting brain alterations and verbal memory impairment in temporal lobe epilepsy2019 · 33 citations
  5. 5Altered interhemispheric functional homotopy and connectivity in temporal lobe epilepsy based on fMRI and multivariate pattern analysis2021 · 23 citations