PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026DEN Open0 citationsOpen Access

Clinical Outcomes and Learning Curve of Endoscopic Ultrasound‐Guided Hepaticogastrostomy During the Implementation Phase in Inexperienced Centers: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

View Full Paper
JKJunichi KanekoTSTatsunori SatohYKYosuke Kobayashi

Key Points

  • This study evaluates the clinical outcomes and learning curves of EUS‐HGS in inexperienced centers, focusing on technical success and adverse events.
  • Retrospective study design involving four tertiary care centers
  • Enrollment of the first 20 patients undergoing EUS‐HGS at each institution
  • Analysis of technical success, procedure time, and serious adverse events
  • Learning curve analysis conducted using chronological quartiles
  • Logistic regression used to identify predictors of technical failure and serious adverse events.
  • Overall technical success rate was 94% for EUS‐HGS procedures
  • Serious adverse events occurred in 11% of patients
  • Procedure time significantly decreased with more experience across quartiles
  • Univariate analysis did not show significant predictors of technical failure; ascites identified as a predictor of serious adverse events in multivariate analysis.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS‐HGS) is a technically demanding procedure performed predominantly at centers with high expertise. Its feasibility and learning curves in inexperienced centers remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the initial clinical outcomes and learning curves of EUS‐HGS implemented in inexperienced centers. Methods Between September 2018 and December 2020, four tertiary care centers specializing in pancreaticobiliary disease implemented EUS‐HGS. The first 20 patients who underwent EUS‐HGS at each institution were retrospectively enrolled. The primary outcomes were technical success, procedure time, and serious (moderate‐to‐severe) adverse events (AEs). A learning curve analysis was conducted using chronological quartiles. Logistic regression was used to identify the predictors of technical failure and serious AEs. Results The overall technical success rate was 94% (75/80); serious AEs occurred in 11% (9/80). Procedure time significantly decreased across quartiles, whereas no significant trend was observed for technical success or serious AE rates. The univariate analysis did not identify significant predictors of technical failure, whereas the multivariate analysis identified ascites as an independent predictor of serious AEs. Conclusions EUS‐HGS can be feasibly implemented with caution in inexperienced centers, particularly when performed by endoscopists with adequate pancreatobiliary expertise. Additionally, during the implementation phase, procedure time decreased with increasing institutional experience.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kaneko et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fdc7c1c9540dea80f853https://doi.org/10.1002/deo2.70291
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Efficacy of a Novel Tapered Contrast Catheter for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy: A Multicenter Study2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop2010 · 2,494 citations
  3. 3Learning curve for peroral endoscopic myotomy in therapeutic endoscopy experts and nonexperts: Large single‐center experience2022 · 17 citations
  4. 4Initial experience with EUS-guided cholangiopancreatography for biliary and pancreatic duct drainage: a Spanish national survey2012 · 265 citations
  5. 5Feasibility and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage in inexperienced centers: a multicenter study in southwest Japan2024 · 10 citations