PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation0 citationsOpen Access

SSVEP-based brain–computer interface enabling graded dyspnoea self-report: proof-of-concept study in healthy volunteers

View Full Paper
SCSébastien CampionVDV DinkelackerIRIsabelle Rivals

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate a BCI that enables self-reporting of dyspnoea in non-communicative patients using steady-state visual evoked potentials.
  • Forty-nine healthy volunteers were studied under five respiratory conditions.
  • Breathing difficulties were assessed using visual analogue scales.
  • Two BCI models were tested: a detection BCI and an analogue scale BCI.
  • Visual stimuli were delivered at different frequency sets to test BCI performance.
  • Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess the performance of the BCI models.
  • Participants reported significant discomfort during inspiratory resistive loading, threshold loading, and CO₂ inhalation.
  • D-BCI achieved a high area under the curve of 0.89 in detecting breathing difficulties.
  • LAS showed an area under the curve of 0.84 for quantifying dyspnoea.

Abstract

Abstract Background Mechanically ventilated patients may experience respiratory suffering, which is difficult to assess when verbal communication is impaired. We evaluated the performance of a steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)-based brain–computer interface (BCI) designed to enable self-reporting of dyspnoea in this context. Methods Forty-nine healthy volunteers were studied under five respiratory conditions: normal breathing (NB), inspiratory resistive loading (IRL), inspiratory threshold loading (ITL), CO₂ inhalation (CO₂), and a return to NB as wash-out (NBWO). Respiratory discomfort was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Two BCIs models were tested: a detection BCI (D-BCI), designed to discriminate between ‘breathing is OK’ and ‘breathing is difficult’, and a quantification BCI in the form of a LED-based analogue scale (LAS), composed of five light-emitting diodes. Visual stimuli were delivered at different frequency sets: 12–15 Hz, 15–20 Hz, and 20–30 Hz for the D-BCI; low frequencies (13–17–19–23–29 Hz) and high frequencies (41–43–47–53–59 Hz) for the LAS. Performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves; the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was the primary outcome. Results Participants reported significant respiratory discomfort during IRL, ITL, and CO₂ conditions in the D-BCI groups, and during ITL and CO₂ in the LAS groups, as reflected by higher dyspnoea VAS scores compared to NB. The best-performing frequency sets were 20–30 Hz for the D-BCI (AUC 0.89 0.89–0.90) and low frequencies for the LAS (AUC 0.84 0.83–0.85). Conclusions This study demonstrates that an SSVEP-based BCI can sucessfully detect and quantify experimentally induced dyspnoea in healthy individuals. Further research is needed to evaluate its clinical applicability for assessing dyspnoea in non-communicative patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Campion et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fe48c1c9540dea810276https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-025-01846-y
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper