PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026European journal of medical research0 citationsOpen Access

Non–HDL to HDL cholesterol ratio and coronary outcomes in U.S. adults: a cross-sectional and prospective NHANES analysis

HXHaibin XuBYBaohong Yao

Key Result

Participants in the highest quartile of non-HDL to HDL cholesterol ratio had paradoxically lower odds of self-reported coronary heart disease (OR 0.39) compared to the lowest quartile.

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the relationship between the non-HDL to HDL cholesterol ratio (NHHR) and coronary heart disease (CHD) outcomes, including mortality.
  • Analyzed NHANES data from 2005–2016 involving adults aged 18 and older.
  • Calculated NHHR as non-HDL-C divided by HDL-C.
  • Applied multivariable logistic regression for cross-sectional CHD associations.
  • Used Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate prospective mortality associations.
  • Employed restricted cubic splines to assess nonlinear relationships.
  • Higher NHHR associated with lower odds of self-reported CHD, with an odds ratio of 0.39 for the highest quartile.
  • Longitudinal data showed higher NHHR linked to lower risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.
  • Spline analysis indicated a U-shaped relationship with optimal NHHR around 3.4 for all-cause and 3.3 for cardiovascular mortality.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=27,091)

Structured PICO

Is the non-HDL to HDL cholesterol ratio (NHHR) associated with coronary heart disease and long-term mortality in U.S. adults?

P
Population
27,091 U.S. adults aged 18 and older from NHANES 2005-2016, followed for a median of 7-10 years to assess the association between lipid ratios and cardiovascular outcomes.
E
Exposure
Higher non-HDL to HDL cholesterol ratio (NHHR)
C
Comparator
Lower NHHR (lowest quartile)
O
Outcome
Self-reported coronary heart disease (cross-sectional) and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality (prospective)hard clinical

Paradoxically, a higher non-HDL to HDL cholesterol ratio was associated with lower odds of self-reported CHD and a U-shaped relationship with mortality, likely reflecting reverse causality or residual confounding in this observational cohort.

Main Result

Odds Ratio: 0.39 (95% CI 0.31–0.5)

p-value: p=<0.0001

Limitations

  • NHHR was derived from a single baseline lipid measurement, which may not fully capture long-term lipid status.
  • CHD prevalence was assessed entirely by self-report.
  • Information on CHD severity, duration, or physician-initiated interventions was not uniformly available.
  • Data on lipid-lowering medication use, physical activity, and dietary factors were inconsistently available and not included in final adjustment models, contributing to residual confounding.
  • The paradoxical inverse association with CHD may reflect residual confounding or reverse causality.
  • Residual confounding
  • Reverse causality
  • Exploratory findings requiring further validation

Abstract

Abstract Background Coronary heart disease (CHD) remains a leading global cause of morbidity and mortality. Dyslipidemia—particularly elevated non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non–HDL-C) and reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)—is a key risk factor for CHD. The ratio of non–HDL-C to HDL-C (NHHR) has been proposed as an integrative marker of lipid-related risk. We separately examined the cross-sectional association of NHHR with CHD status and its prospective association with long-term mortality in a nationally representative U.S. cohort. Methods We analyzed data from adults (aged ≥ 18 years) in NHANES 2005–2016. NHHR was calculated as non–HDL-C divided by HDL-C. Cross-sectional associations between NHHR and self-reported CHD were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Prospective associations of baseline NHHR with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were examined using Cox proportional hazards models. Restricted cubic splines (3 knots) were used to explore potential nonlinear relationships. Results Among ~ 20,000 adults, higher NHHR was paradoxically associated with lower odds of self-reported CHD. In fully adjusted models, participants in the highest NHHR quartile had an odds ratio of 0.39 (95% CI, 0.31–0.50; p < 0.0001) compared to the lowest quartile. In longitudinal analyses over a median follow-up of 7–10 years, higher NHHR was associated with lower hazard of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Spline analyses suggested a U-shaped relationship, with nadirs at NHHR ≈3.4 for all-cause and ≈3.3 for cardiovascular mortality ( P for nonlinearity < 0.001). Conclusions In this large NHANES-based observational study, NHHR was cross-sectionally associated with lower CHD prevalence and longitudinally associated with reduced mortality. While similar patterns have been reported in prior NHANES studies, our analysis contributes additional insight by jointly modeling both CHD and mortality outcomes using nonlinear spline approaches and subgroup analyses. The paradoxical inverse association with CHD may reflect residual confounding or reverse causality. These findings remain exploratory and require cautious interpretation and further validation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xu et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Coronary heart disease and mortality (n=27,091). Non-HDL to HDL cholesterol ratio (NHHR) vs. Lowest NHHR quartile (Q1) was evaluated on Self-reported coronary heart disease (CHD) (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.31-0.50, p=<0.0001). Participants in the highest quartile of non-HDL to HDL cholesterol ratio had paradoxically lower odds of self-reported coronary heart disease (OR 0.39) compared to the lowest quartile.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fe48c1c9540dea8102ebhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-026-03977-x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper