PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Research on Aging0 citations

Associations Between Cognitive Risk Scores and Objective Cognition by Sexual Orientation: Evidence From the CLSA

View Full Paper
AGAlexandra GradyASArne Stinchcombe

Key Points

  • The study aims to compare cognitive risk and objective cognitive performance between LGB and heterosexual older adults.
  • Used baseline data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging
  • Assessed cognitive risk with the ANU-ADRI index
  • Evaluated cognitive performance through a composite score from six tests
  • Applied t-tests, chi-square tests, and linear regression for analysis
  • LGB participants had lower cognitive risk scores than heterosexual participants
  • LGB participants showed higher cognitive performance scores than heterosexual participants
  • Higher rates of depression and smoking were reported among LGB participants
  • LGB participants had lower levels of social engagement

Abstract

This study investigated differences in cognitive risk and objective cognitive performance between lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB; n = 309) and heterosexual ( n = 16,207) older adults using baseline data (2011–2015) from the Comprehensive cohort of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). Cognitive risk was assessed using the Australian National University – Alzheimer’s Disease Risk Index (ANU-ADRI). Cognitive performance was measured using a composite score based on performance on six cognitive tests. The analytic strategy included a combination of t-tests, chi-square tests, and linear regression models. Contrary to expectations, LGB participants exhibited lower cognitive risk scores (M = −1.08, SD = 8.85) in comparison to heterosexual participants (M = 0.61, SD = 10.62). On subcomponents of the ANU-ADRI score, LGB participants reported higher rates of depression and smoking, and lower social engagement. In terms of cognitive performance, LGB participants scored significantly higher (M = 104.58, SD = 14.72) in comparison to heterosexual participants (M = 100.12, SD = 15.05). This difference remained even after controlling for ANU-ADRI score, race, and income. Our findings highlight the importance of incorporating sociodemographic characteristics into cognitive risk assessments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Grady et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fe68c1c9540dea810666https://doi.org/10.1177/01640275261417696
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper