PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Veterinary Record0 citations

Feasibility and acceptability of meticillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus biosecurity measures in equine facilities: A cross‐sectional study

View Full Paper
PPPauline PlanesJAJulie ArsenaultMAMarion Allano

Key Points

  • The research aims to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of biosecurity measures for MRSA in equine facilities.
  • Conducted an online questionnaire with clients of a veterinary teaching hospital.
  • Collected data on horse activities, stable characteristics, and perceptions regarding biosecurity.
  • Measured feasibility and acceptability scores of recommended biosecurity measures.
  • 96% of respondents reported direct contact between horses.
  • 88% of stables had hand sanitizers, while 12% lacked sinks.
  • Respondents supported adherence to practices to manage MRSA-positive horses despite challenges in implementing additional measures.

Abstract

Abstract Background Biosecurity measures are recommended in stables housing meticillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)‐positive horses, but their feasibility and acceptability, as well as their implementation barriers, remain unclear. Methods A cross‐sectional study was conducted among clients of a veterinary teaching hospital using an online questionnaire. Information on horse activities, stable characteristics and perceptions (feasibility and acceptability scores) of recommended biosecurity measures for MRSA‐positive horses was collected. Results Fifty‐seven horse and/or stable owners completed the questionnaire. Direct contact between horses and shared equipment was reported by 96% and 58% of the respondents, respectively. Hand sanitisers were present in 88% of the stables, but 12% lacked sinks. In a case of MRSA‐positive horse, respondents strongly supported adherence to antibiotic therapy, avoidance of contact between horses or with high‐risk body areas and hand washing. Measures requiring additional infrastructure or resources were perceived as less feasible and acceptable. Limited resources, financial constraints and seasonal factors were identified as barriers to implementation. Limitations The study population may not be representative of all horse facilities. Conclusion While most measures were feasible and acceptable, challenges remain in implementing measures requiring additional infrastructures and staff.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Planes et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980feb9c1c9540dea8110eahttps://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.70338
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper