PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Mild Head Injury: Criteria for Computed Tomography Scan

View Full Paper
IGI. GarbaASA., Speelman,TATabari AM

Key Points

  • The study aims to identify clinical risk factors that determine the necessity of CT scans for mild head injury patients.
  • Conducted a retrospective study at a trauma unit in a teaching hospital.
  • Analyzed CT scans of 50 patients aged 14 and older with mild head injury.
  • Correlated clinical history and risk factors with CT findings.
  • Used chi-square statistical analysis at a 95% confidence interval.
  • 46% of patients had abnormal CT findings associated with clinical risk factors.
  • Patients with normal scans tended to have no clinical risk factors.
  • Specific risk factors included severe headache, skull fracture, and loss of consciousness.
  • Patients without risk factors were more likely to have normal CT scans.

Abstract

Background/Objective: Mild Head Injury (MHI) is the most common type of head trauma, and forms a majority of the injuries seen in the trauma unit (65–85%). This study was aimed at using previously identified clinical risk factors to determine which category of patients with MHI would not need to undergo Computed Tomography (CT). This may serve as a cost-saving measure to patients and hospitals, and likewise reduce collective radiation dose to the population. Methodology: A retrospective study was conducted at the trauma unit of a teaching hospital situated in the Cape Metropole. CT scan images of 50 patients aged 14 years and above who had MHI and underwent CT examination were retrieved from the archive. Patients’ information, clinical history and resultant CT findings were collated. Clinical risk factors were correlated with abnormal and normal CT scan findings. Data were analyzed using chi-square statistic at 95% confidence interval. Results: Twenty-three (46%) of the patients had abnormal CT findings, and all presented with one or more of these risk factors: severe headache (10%), skull fracture (20%), scalp injury (6%), loss of consciousness (LOC) (8%) and intoxication (2%). The results were not statistically significant when compared with the normal CT scans group. Four patients (8%) with no risk factors had normal CT scans. All the patients presenting with the clinical risk factors of nausea and vomiting (6%), and seizures (4%) had normal CT scan findings. Conclusion: Certain clinical risk factors can be used to suggest the probability of abnormal CT scan in patients with MHI. Patients with no risk factors, such as those with confusion and disorientation, are more likely to have normal CT findings and may therefore be exempted from CT examination. Further studies with larger sample size may be helpful in validating these findings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Garba et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fecbc1c9540dea81127dhttps://doi.org/10.82547/jrrs.vol23no1.128
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper