PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Family Medicine Residency Match Is Not a “Field of Dreams”

View Full Paper
MSMorgan SticklerWSW. Mitchel ShaverAFAdam M. Franks

Key Points

  • Examine the impact of the growing number of family medicine residency positions on unfilled slots and program effectiveness.
  • Analyzed trends in family medicine residency positions from 2012 to the present.
  • Compared the growth in residency slots to the increase in unfilled positions and programs.
  • Calculated linear rates of change in unfilled positions over specified time periods.
  • The number of unfilled residency programs rose 4.5-fold from 64 to 288.
  • Unfilled residency slots increased from 142 to 805, marking a 5.5-fold rise.
  • Linear rates of unfilled programs per 1,000 positions surged from 0.4 to 271.5 over a decade.

Abstract

Workforce projections predict a significant lack of primary care providers nationally. Increased family medicine residency programs and positions have been celebrated as the answer to these projections. Since 2012, the number of positions offered annually has increased almost 2-fold from 2,740 to 5,357. While this has the potential to help alleviate this disaster, very few are questioning the unintended consequences of additional family medicine positions. Over this same 14-year period, the number of programs failing to fill in the National Residency Match Program have increased 4.5-fold (64 to 288) with the number of unfilled slots increasing over 5.5-fold (142 to 805). Linear rates of change for unfilled residency programs per every 1,000 residency positions created have increased from 0.4 prior to 2018 to 69.3 between 2018 and 2021 to 271.5 after 2021. Unfilled programs experience multiple negative consequences including reputation damage and increase coverage responsibilities. Further addition of family medicine training position volume is therefore likely harmful to existing programs. Better solutions should be explored to creatively increase student interest in family medicine by emphasizing and leveraging the value of family medicine physicians and primary care.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stickler et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980ff49c1c9540dea8121a4https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2025.250131r1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper