PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging0 citations

Coronary CT for CAV detection in paediatric patients; a single centre experience

View Full Paper
NIN IhanainenRPRiitta PaakkanenJPJuha Peltonen

Key Points

  • The aim is to summarize the use of coronary CT imaging for detecting cardiac allograft vasculopathy in paediatric heart transplant patients.
  • Coronary CT replaced invasive angiography in patient surveillance from 2/2022.
  • 35 paediatric cardiac transplant patients were assessed using CT imaging.
  • CT images were analyzed with syngo.via software for evaluation of CAV.
  • CAV detected in 2 out of 35 patients (6%), confirmed by angiography.
  • No unplanned angiographies were conducted after implementing CT screening.
  • Median effective radiation dose was 1.85 mSv, facilitating safer imaging procedures.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a feared complication after heart transplant (1). CT imaging is an attractive option for screening of CAV, especially in paediatric patients, a population in which CAV is diagnosed in only 4% in routine screening (2). Although increasingly reported in adult population, little data exist on the use of CT in CAV detection in paediatric patients (3,4). Purpose This report summarizes the experience and protocol of CT imaging in evaluating CAV in paediatric heart transplant patients. Methods Coronary CT replaced invasive angiography in the paediatric cardiac post-transplant surveillance protocol from 2/2022 in our institution (Figure 1). Since then, 35 paediatric cardiac transplant patients (16 males) have been assessed (Revolution CT, GE Healthcare, Chicago, USA). Of note, only three patients received isosorbide dinitrate prior to imaging as the routine use in paediatric population is not recommended (5). The CT images were analysed and reformatted with syngo.via software (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). Results The median age was 13.4 years (range 2.0-19.6 years). CT was performed at median of 5.0 years (range 1.0-18.2 years) post-transplant. No sedation was performed solely for the CT. Eight patients required sedation due to MRI scan performed at the same visit. The mean heart rate was 80 bpm (range 60-127 bpm), with 20 patients with heart rate above the intended age-specific limits regardless of the medication (Figure 1). CAV was found in two patients (6%) by CT, both confirmed in subsequent angiography (Figure 2). After the start of CT screening for CAV, no unplanned angiographies have been performed. The median radiation dose was 53.7 mGy.cm (range 21.3-206.26), median effective dose 1.85 mSv (range 0.72-5.6 mSv). Conclusions CAV screening may be performed in paediatric heart transplantation patients also by CT, even with higher heart rates and without the routine use of isosorbide dinitrate. Larger studies and longer follow-up will be needed to assess the role and optimal timing for CAV screening.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ihanainen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980ff49c1c9540dea8121b4https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaf367.345
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Clinical implementation of coronary computed tomography angiography for routine detection of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in heart transplant patients2021 · 23 citations
  2. 2Screening of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in heart transplant patients with coronary computed tomography angiography2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy Assessment in Heart-transplanted Patients: The Value of Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography2026
  4. 4Computed Tomographic Angiography Imaging of Pediatric Congenital Heart Diseases2025
  5. 5Invasive Coronary Imaging Assessment for Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: State-of-the-Art Review2022 · 14 citations