PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026PLOS Digital Health0 citationsOpen Access

Hierarchy and hope: Exploring AI’s role in medicine through a thematic analysis of online discourse

View Full Paper
JPJohan PushaniSRSherwin RajkumarABAlishya Burrell

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore the varying perceptions of AI in medicine among premedical students, medical students, and physicians.
  • Conducted a thematic analysis of discussions on Reddit about AI in medicine.
  • Analyzed 2403 comments from 47 threads spanning December 2022 to August 2023.
  • Developed a coding scheme based on Braun and Clarke’s qualitative framework.
  • Identified themes regarding AI’s potential to enhance or replace medical roles.
  • Major themes included the idea of AI enhancing efficiency versus the risk of job replacement.
  • Lower-tier medical careers were seen as most susceptible to AI replacement.
  • Participants generally perceived AI positively, yet exhibited socially biased views that may threaten collaboration in healthcare.
  • Concerns were raised about the implications of biased perceptions for patient care.

Abstract

The healthcare community remains divided on the benefits of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine. In this qualitative study, we sought to better understand the perceived opportunities and threats of AI among premedical students, medical students, and physicians. We conducted a thematic analysis on Reddit, a social platform where candid opinions are often shared. Posts from the r/premed, r/medicalschool, and r/medicine subreddits were searched using the terms “AI”, “chatGPT”, “openAI”, and “artificial intelligence”. We analyzed 2403 comments across 47 threads from December 2022 to August 2023. A coding scheme was developed manually following Braun and Clarke’s (2006) framework, and common themes were extracted. The main themes identified centered on AI enhancement versus replacement. Careers perceived to be lower in the medical social hierarchy were considered most at risk of replacement. AI was thought to first replace non-medical jobs, followed by mid-levels, and then primary care and diagnostic specialties, with specialists and surgeons affected last. Some contributors emphasized that AI could never replace a physician’s compassion and nuanced clinical judgment. Others viewed AI as a tool to enhance efficiency, particularly in tasks such as studying, note writing, screening, and triage. Although verifying the credentials of commenters on online forums poses a challenge, platforms like Reddit offer a valuable opportunity to understand nuanced attitudes and perceptions regarding AI in medicine. Online forums allow for a unique understanding of the impressions of AI in medicine. While AI was generally well-received, we identified a key finding: a socially hierarchical, biased form of thinking among healthcare professionals. The perpetuation of this biased mindset may contribute to role devaluation, mistrust, and collaboration challenges within healthcare teams–ultimately impacting patient care. To fully leverage AI’s potential in medicine, it is critical to acknowledge and address potentially biased perceptions within the healthcare community.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pushani et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980ff49c1c9540dea81229fhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001212
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper