PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Sustainable Development0 citationsOpen Access

Climate Action Delay Discourses in the Sports Sector: Insights From Interviews With Athletes and Staff

View Full Paper
PSPascal StegmannMSManuel Suter

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore and analyze the discourses that delay climate action in the sports sector.
  • Conducted 28 semi-structured interviews with athletes and sports federation employees
  • Analyzed data based on two climate delay discourse typologies
  • Identified discourses justifying inaction towards climate change mitigation
  • Examined differences between athletes and sports federation staff perspectives
  • Identified narratives emphasizing being trapped in a climate-damaging system
  • Confirmed perceptions of low sports climate responsibility and reliance on voluntary actions
  • Highlighted a lack of resources as a major barrier to climate action
  • Revealed the need for leadership from various stakeholders for effective change

Abstract

ABSTRACT There is a major contradiction between the current model of international elite sport and efforts to mitigate climate change. This study investigates climate action delay discourses within the sports sector by analyzing 28 semi‐structured interviews with athletes and sports federation employees. Based on the two climate delay discourse typologies of Lamb et al. (2020, Global Sustainability , 3 : e17) and Cherry et al. (2024, Global Environmental Change 87: 102875), we identify and confirm several discourses that justify inaction or inadequate efforts toward climate change mitigation in the sports sector. System‐related narratives emphasized being trapped in the climate‐damaging system of international elite sport and stressed the need for leadership from other stakeholders inside and outside the sports sector. These system‐related narratives contradict other identified discourses that perceive sports climate responsibility as low and suggest an emphasis on voluntary climate actions. Narratives frequently also point to a lack of resources as a barrier to climate action. The discourses raised differences between athletes and sports federation employees. The study highlights the need to address both cognitive and structural dimensions of climate action delay and outlines approaches to challenge these discourses within the sports sector.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stegmann et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980ffa4c1c9540dea81244bhttps://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70747
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Climate Action Delay Discourses in the Sports Sector: Insights From Interviews With Athletes and Staff2026
  2. 2Championing Sustainability: Engaging Sports Stakeholders in Climate Change Mitigation2025
  3. 3Policy vs. practice in sport and climate change: the perspectives of key actors in global sport and international development2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4Navigating the playing field: Reimagining the sports industry in the face of accelerated climate change2024 · 2 citations
  5. 5Deliberate, incidental, incapable, or unwilling: Sport clubs framing of climate issues2026