PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Cardiology Research and Practice0 citationsOpen Access

Arrhythmogenic Mechanisms of Novel Biomarkers in Cardiac Electrophysiology

JLJin LiuHGHuijie GuoYLYanmin Liu

Key Result

Novel biomarkers reveal pathological mechanisms of arrhythmia in inflammation, fibrosis, autoimmunity, and electrical remodeling, but require large-scale multicenter validation for clinical use.

Key Points

  • This review aims to explore the mechanisms of novel biomarkers in arrhythmia and their potential clinical applications.
  • Comprehensive search of studies from 2010 to 2025 in multiple databases
  • Focus on mechanisms of biomarkers in inflammation, fibrosis, autoimmunity, and electrical remodeling
  • Discussion of clinical translation challenges and future research directions.
  • Novel biomarkers show promise in predicting arrhythmia risk and aiding precision diagnosis
  • Clinical translation faces challenges like assay standardization and validation
  • Future studies should include combined and subtype-specific biomarkers for better outcomes.

Study Design

Type

Systematic Review

PICO

P
Population
Arrhythmia
E
Exposure / Comparator
Novel biomarkers
O
Primary Outcome
Mechanisms underlying the role of arrhythmia biomarkers in inflammation, fibrosis, autoimmunity, and electrical remodeling and clinical translation potential

Limitations

  • Lack of standardization of assays
  • Insufficient clinical prospective validation
  • lack of standardization of assays
  • insufficient clinical prospective validation

Abstract

Arrhythmia is an important cause of cardiovascular disease deaths and a serious threat to human health, but the current means of identification are limited. Biomarkers, with the advantages of easy access and rapid detection, have shown significant value in arrhythmia risk prediction, precision diagnosis, and prognosis assessment. In recent years, with the development of molecular biology and multiomics technology, some novel biomarkers have made great breakthroughs in revealing the pathological mechanisms of arrhythmia. However, clinical translation still faces challenges such as a lack of standardization of assays and insufficient clinical prospective validation. This review comprehensively searched studies published between 2010 and 2025 in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and CENTRAL databases, focusing on the mechanisms underlying the role of arrhythmia biomarkers in inflammation, fibrosis, autoimmunity, and electrical remodeling and clinical translation potential. Future research should focus on the combined application of multiple biomarkers and the discovery of subtype‐specific markers. Conducting large‐scale, multicenter studies to validate these biomarkers and ultimately integrate them into clinical practice is crucial for advancing biomarker‐guided individualized antiarrhythmic therapy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Arrhythmia. Novel biomarkers was evaluated on Mechanisms underlying the role of arrhythmia biomarkers in inflammation, fibrosis, autoimmunity, and electrical remodeling and clinical translation potential. Novel biomarkers reveal pathological mechanisms of arrhythmia in inflammation, fibrosis, autoimmunity, and electrical remodeling, but require large-scale multicenter validation for clinical use.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980ffc6c1c9540dea81291fhttps://doi.org/10.1155/crp/2453934
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper