PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026AIAA Journal0 citations

Tangential-Velocity Gradient at Stagnation-Point Boundary-Layer Edge for Hypersonic Spheres

View Full Paper
SGSangdi Gu

Key Points

  • The research aims to accurately assess the tangential velocity gradient at stagnation-point boundary-layer edges to enhance heat flux predictions.
  • Developed a theoretical approach to evaluate the tangential velocity gradient at the boundary-layer edge.
  • Considered linear variation of the inviscid gradient along stagnation streamlines.
  • Used axisymmetric Navier-Stokes simulations for validation across various gas models and temperatures.
  • Proposed method increases prediction accuracy for stagnation point heat flux.
  • Showed higher viscosity increases the gradient difference across gas models.
  • Demonstrated no significant thermochemical nonequilibrium effects exist at the boundary-layer edge.

Abstract

This paper presents a new theoretical approach for accurately evaluating the tangential velocity gradient at the stagnation-point boundary-layer (BL) edge, a key parameter for predicting stagnation point heat flux. Traditional methods often use inviscid stagnation point values, which this study shows can introduce significant errors in practical scenarios. Both the BL edge and inviscid tangential velocity gradients decrease with increasing thermochemistry. Higher viscosity increases the difference between these gradients for a given gas model but reduces the disparity between edge values across different gas models. Additionally, neither the edge nor inviscid stagnation point values show significant thermochemical nonequilibrium effects, and nonequilibrium values are well approximated by equilibrium values. The proposed approach derives the BL edge tangential velocity gradient by considering the linear variation of the inviscid gradient along the stagnation streamline, the absence of BL displacement, and the ratio of BL thickness to shock standoff distance, Formula: see text, for which a new analytical expression including real-gas effects is developed. Validation is performed using two-dimensional axisymmetric Navier–Stokes simulations across a range of gas models, gas mixtures, and high-enthalpy freestream conditions for both cold (300 K) and hot (2000 K) walls. This approach significantly improves theoretical prediction accuracy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sangdi Gu (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69843383f1d9ada3c1fb0aechttps://doi.org/10.2514/1.j066315
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper