PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Journal of Biological Rhythms0 citations

Circadian Timing Moderates Diurnal Positive Affect Rhythms in Adolescents

View Full Paper
RMRiya MirchandaneyDWDelainey L. WescottMKMargaret C. Kuzemchak

Key Points

  • The research aims to explore the relationship between circadian timing and diurnal positive affect rhythms in adolescents.
  • Studied high-school adolescents with prior alcohol use (N = 126), aged approximately 17.3 years.
  • Employed cosinor models to assess diurnal rhythms in positive affect.
  • Analyzed metrics like circadian preference, chronotype, and actigraphy-based midsleep for circadian timing.
  • Investigated weekday-weekend differences in positive affect metrics.
  • Identified significant diurnal rhythms in positive affect with an acrophase at 3:39 PM.
  • Later circadian timing correlated with a later positive affect acrophase across multiple measures.
  • Notable differences in positive affect were observed between weekends and weekdays, affecting mesor and amplitude.

Abstract

In adult samples, tightly-controlled laboratory studies indicate the presence of circadian rhythms in positive (and negative) affect. Naturalistic studies also suggest the presence of diurnal positive affect rhythms in adults, the characteristics (acrophase, mesor, and amplitude) of which vary by self-report circadian preference—greater evening preference is associated with later acrophase, lower mesor, and lower amplitude in positive affect. We examined the extent to which diurnal affect rhythms are associated with 4 different measures of circadian timing, including dim light melatonin onset, in a sample of high-school adolescents who reported at least one drink of alcohol in their lifetime ( N = 126, 17.3 ± 0.87 years, 55.6% female). Cosinor models found support for robust diurnal rhythms in positive, but not negative, affect. The overall modeled positive affect rhythm had an acrophase at 3:39 PM, a mesor of 9.77, and an amplitude of 1.61. Later circadian timing was associated with later acrophase in positive affect rhythms across the following measures: circadian preference (3:00 PM vs 4:20 PM, p < .001), chronotype (3:20 PM vs 4:11 PM, p = .014), and actigraphy-based midsleep (3:08 PM vs 4:16 PM, p = .014). We did not find significant associations between circadian phase (dim light melatonin onset) and positive affect rhythms. We also explored weekday-weekend differences in positive affect rhythms, finding significantly higher mesor (9.71 vs 9.99, p = .004) and lower amplitude (1.69 vs 1.26, p = .008) on the weekends than weekdays. In sum, compared to their peers, adolescents with later sleep and circadian timing experience a delayed peak in positive affect during the day, which may have consequences for behavioral activation and depressed mood. These findings underscore the importance of considering the role of sleep and circadian factors in affective processes during adolescence.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mirchandaney et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69843398f1d9ada3c1fb0dcfhttps://doi.org/10.1177/07487304251408573
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper