PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Journal of Clinical Ultrasound0 citations

Facial Floor Measurements at Second Trimester Scan and Relations to Biparietal Diameter and Head Circumference

View Full Paper
CLCátia LourençoASAna SilvaMPMariana Pinto

Key Points

  • This study evaluates the correlation between facial measurements and cranial biometric parameters to predict craniofacial conditions.
  • Data extracted from obstetrical records
  • Twelve facial measurements across facial levels were evaluated
  • Correlation analyses conducted with biparietal diameter and head circumference
  • Multiple linear regression models developed to assess predictive values
  • Significant but weak associations identified between most facial measurements and both BPD and HC (r < 0.25)
  • BPD showed stronger relationships compared to HC
  • BPD identified as a significant predictor for upper and middle facial dimensions (p < 0.001)
  • Fewer significant associations found for HC regarding facial dimensions

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Prenatal assessment of facial morphology offers valuable insights into craniofacial malformations and aneuploidies, characterized by distinct craniofacial features. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between twelve facial measurements across the three levels of the face and the predictive value of cranial biometric parameters such as biparietal diameter (BPD) and head circumference (HC). Methods Data were extracted from obstetrical records and included twelve facial measurements across upper, middle, and lower facial levels, as well as biometric parameters such as BPD and HC. Correlation analyses between each measurement and BPD/HC and multiple linear regression models were constructed to evaluate the predictive value of BPD and HC. Results Correlation analyses revealed weak but significant associations ( r < 0.25) between most facial variables and both BPD and HC, with BPD showing stronger and more consistent relationships. In regression models, BPD emerged as a significant predictor of facial dimensions in the upper and middle levels ( p < 0.001), while HC showed fewer significant associations. Conclusions HC appears to be a stronger predictor of these differences in facial dimensions than BPD. Further validation in larger, prospective cohorts is recommended to confirm these associations and enhance clinical applicability.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lourenço et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698433a5f1d9ada3c1fb0ecfhttps://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.70189
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Growth pattern of the philtrum in cases of normal and pathological fetal development2016 · 3 citations
  2. 2Prenasal Thickness, Prefrontal Space Ratio and Other Facial Profile Markers in First-Trimester Fetuses with Aneuploidies, Cleft Palate, and Micrognathia2016 · 27 citations
  3. 3Growth of the fetal nose width and nostril distance in normal pregnancies1997 · 20 citations
  4. 4Ultrasound evaluation of the length of the fetal nasal bones throughout gestation1995 · 98 citations
  5. 5Sphenofrontal distance on three-dimensional ultrasound in euploid and trisomy-21 fetuses at 16-24 weeks' gestation2016 · 7 citations