PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology0 citationsOpen Access

Investigating the benefits of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for patients experiencing infections after total hip replacement surgery: a retrospective cohort study with a minimum of one year of follow-up

View Full Paper
JZJiaqing ZhuTXTianwei XiaLWLu Wang

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections after total hip replacement.
  • Retrospective analysis of 15 patients with periprosthetic infections after total hip arthroplasty from September 2018 to September 2024.
  • Joint fluid collected for both bacterial culture and metagenomic sequencing upon hospital admission.
  • Infections followed for a minimum of one year post-treatment with adjustments in antibiotics based on test results.
  • Bacterial culture identified pathogenic bacteria in 10 cases (66.7%), while mNGS was positive in all 15 cases (100%).
  • mNGS detected a total of 19 pathogenic bacteria types, compared to 12 from bacterial culture.
  • The infection control rate post-treatment was 93.3%, with 14 of 15 patients free of infection during follow-up.

Abstract

Objective To explore the clinical significance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) technology in diagnosing and treating periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods From September 2018 to September 2024, 15 patients with periprosthetic infection after total hip arthroplasty were admitted. There were 11 males and 4 females; ages ranged from 28 to 87 years old, with an average of 63 years old. Infection occurred 6 to 42 months after total hip arthroplasty, with an average of 22.7 months. The infection lasted between 15 and 115 days, averaging 37.6 days. After being admitted to the hospital, joint fluid was collected for bacterial culture and mNGS. Following admission, joint fluid was collected for bacterial culture and mNGS, and antibiotics were adjusted based on the results, with surgery used to control the infection if needed. Results Bacterial culture method was positive in 10 cases (66.7%), with a total of 12 pathogenic bacteria types detected. MNGS was positive in 15 cases (100.0%), with a total of 19 pathogenic bacteria types detected. There was a statistically significant difference in the positive rate between the two methods (P 0.05). Out of the 10 patients, 5 who tested positive using both the bacterial culture method and mNGS test showed identical pathogenic bacterial types, resulting in a 50.0% compliance rate. The testing time (from sample delivery to results) was (3.07 ± 0.96) days for bacterial culture method and (1.67 ± 0.49) days for mNGS test, and the difference was statistically significant (t=5.03, P0.001). The patients were followed up for 13 to 82 months, with a mean of 40.7 months. In one patient, the infection returned three months after undergoing one-stage revision surgery, while the other 14 patients showed no signs of infection, resulting in an infection control rate of 93.3%. Conclusion MNGS can detect the pathogenic bacteria of postoperative PJI after THA more quickly and accurately than the bacterial culture method, which is crucial for guiding antibiotic and surgical treatment combinations for patients with postoperative PJI after THA.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698433a5f1d9ada3c1fb0fa3https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2026.1735867
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-stage versus two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection after knee arthroplasty: a call for a randomised trial2024 · 10 citations
  2. 2The Incidence Rate, Microbiological Etiology, and Results of Treatments of Prosthetic Joint Infection following Total Knee Arthroplasty2023 · 23 citations
  3. 3Twenty common errors in the diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic joint infection2019 · 141 citations
  4. 4The conundrum of ultraclean air, deep infections, and artificial joint replacement2019 · 5 citations
  5. 5Clinical Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Pathogen Detection2018 · 1,505 citations