PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026American Journal of Biological Anthropology0 citations

Allometry and Evolution of Neurocranial Narrowness Across Nonhuman Anthropoid Primates

View Full Paper
IMIsabel MormileCPChristopher J. PercivalJRJames B. Rossie

Key Points

  • This research investigates the relationship between body size and neurocranial narrowness among anthropoid primates.
  • Identified inter-clade shifts in neurocranial narrowness using GLS pANCOVA.
  • Conducted ancestral trait estimation through parsimony reconstruction methods.
  • Analyzed linear measurements of both extant and fossil anthropoid skulls.
  • Callitrichine and female cebine platyrrhines showed greater neurocranial narrowness than predicted by body size.
  • Neurocranial narrowness displayed differing allometric relationships among various anthropoid clades.
  • Most anthropoid clades did not show a correlation between neurocranial narrowness and body size.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives Among anthropoid primates, small‐bodied platyrrhines exhibit striking mediolateral narrowness of the neurocranium relative to larger‐bodied platyrrhines. Body size allometry has been hypothesized to explain variation in neurocranial narrowness. However, interspecific catarrhine variation appears inconsistent with the proposed platyrrhine allometry. This study tested the relationship between body size and neurocranial narrowness across anthropoids to identify whether clade‐specific allometries have evolved. We further estimated neurocranial narrowness in anthropoid ancestors to determine the trait's evolutionary polarity. Methods Inter‐clade shifts in degree and allometric scaling of neurocranial narrowness were identified with GLS pANCOVA, which combines generalized least‐squares analysis (GLS) and phylogenetic analysis of covariance (pANCOVA). Ancestral trait estimation was performed using parsimony reconstruction methods, based on linear measurements of extant and fossil anthropoid skulls. Results In callitrichine and female cebine platyrrhines, neurocranial narrowness was significantly greater than predicted by body size and displayed a different allometric relationship than in other anthropoids. This shift is correlated with decreased neurocranial breadth in callitrichines, but not cebines. Neurocranial narrowness was not correlated with body size in most anthropoid clades. Discussion We did not identify a unified neurocranial narrowness allometry across platyrrhines or across anthropoids collectively. Nonetheless, reduced narrowness occurred parallel to the evolution of increased body size in catarrhines, atelids, and pitheciids, suggesting that larger body size may mitigate constraints on neurocranial shape responsible for narrow neurocrania in small‐bodied fossil anthropoids, which have been retained only in small‐bodied platyrrhines. Feeding adaptations and brain size also provide potential explanations for neurocranial narrowness variation in some clades.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mormile et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698433d8f1d9ada3c1fb147bhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.70208
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A new extinct primate among the Pleistocene megafauna of Bahia, Brazil.1996 · 104 citations
  2. 2Adaptation and body size in primates1980 · 45 citations
  3. 3Cranial sutures as intramembranous bone growth sites2000 · 652 citations
  4. 4Multiplicative by nature: Why logarithmic transformation is necessary in allometry2008 · 306 citations
  5. 5The ecology of oligocene African anthropoidea1980 · 159 citations